Sizing is difficult, I know SQ wears a size 7 in Lanvin (which I don't think is even based on any origins like EU, UK, US, etc.... that is why I always ask on the size printed on the shoe and box just o be sure) but iirc he also wears a size 41 in MMM while I wear a 42.
Originally Posted by steveoffice
I also wear size 7 in Lanvins and size 42 in MMM. SQ's sizing is strange to me because MMM in size 42 fits me more snug than size 7 Lanvins. If you are size 41 in MMM Lanvin 7 might have some room at the end.
my lowtop MMMs actually fit me really snug. They stretched out quite a bit. I have another pair in size 41 that I have never worn because I don't feel like breaking in a new pair. Next time I will get 42 in the lowtops. my hightops in size 41 fit me fine.
Originally Posted by dmash1080
SQ-I think the sizing chart should be changed for Lanvins. It should say that they fit 2 sizes bigger than marked size, not 1.5. Ex. A Lanvin 7=UK7/US8 but fits a US 9.
well they fit two sizes larger than the marked size. however the marked size is not a US measurement, it is UK as far as I understand. So when you convert the UK size to US size, then one can say it fits feet 1 to 1.5 sizes bigger than marked.
My right foot is US 9.5 measured on a brannock. My left foot is US 9 on the brannock.
So a Lanvin 7 (UK) translates to a US 8. and it fits both of my feet perfectly, hence me saying it fits feet up to 1.5 sizes bigger.