Originally Posted by Fuuma
I saw them at Colette and Lanvin and they suck, like big time. Well they look like those brown trekking shoes engineers wear to class.
hahaha. dude they are like magic. when you put them on they look awesome. they have this narrow, arrowhead feel to them. i think it goes really well with chino/khaki colored pants. ill blow up waywt with them soon enough ;-)
Originally Posted by *Tee*
I know. I wasn't contradicting you when I said "N.D.C. > F&B > OC". It was just my personal opinion on the labels and how they compare... ( style- as well as quality-wise )
I'm not sure how Neil Barrett sneakers, depending on model and season, vary quality-wise. I can only talk about my pair and the few pairs I got my hands on in stores. Mine are identically soled as Lanvins, Y's etc., made of very similar leather and don't look cheap at all. You're right about the lining, though. NB's are unlined...
PS: I'm referring to Lanvin low-tops... ( if that makes a difference )
you musn't have had your hands on lanvins anytime recently considering lanvin hasn't been using that CP/Raf/Balenciaga sole for like 2 years now. there is no difference between the soles on the low and hi-tops btw (aside from colors occasionally).
Originally Posted by Uncontrol
i think i regret sleeping on those lanvins
told you, you should have bought them. I vote no on the leopard print dbss. they lack versatility & longevity i think.rfx45:
im just teasing but you really need to learn to get your their/they're/theres straight