Quote:
As much as I would love to claim otherwise I believe this is pretty much standard critical perception of Kurosawa.
I don't mean to be rude, but are you actually watching the majority of his films or have you just seen a handful and going off of that? Your view is definitely the 'standard critical perception' of Kurosawa (the patchy career).
Quote:
For every great film he had a Scandal, Dodesukaden, Dersu Uzala, or Dreams.
If those are bad films, I will give it away. Sure, Scandal, Dodesukaden, and Dreams might be inferior to some of his other films, but most directors could make a career from a Dersu Uzala.
Quote:
The guy's suicide attempt was largely understood as his statement on the decline of his artistic powers. That's not denigrate him at all, his best are among the best in all of cinema.
He was NEVER appreciated in Japan. Financially, his backing dried up. He struggled to make pictures in the latter part of his career (it was impractical to back him commercially). Waning talent was the least of his concern.
Quote:
He very obviously took some serious influence from Ford, and Hawks, but became one of the greats in his own right.
I hate the comparison because Kurosawa was the better filmmaker (yes, I know it's subjective). Hell, the general perception is that Ford made the quintessential Westerns when Boetticher, Peckinpah and Mann were equally capable.
Quote:
Bresson, as stated before, is on a very short list of film makers. The guy came as close to making pure motion pictures as possible. The only one on the same level in that respect is Tarkovsky.
Aesthetically, Tarkovsky was in a class of his own. Overall, I think filmmakers like Bergman, Fellini and Bunuel deserve some attention, too. I'm surprised you included Cronenberg. He doesn't belong on a shortlist of a 1000.