Originally Posted by voxsartoria
Yes, and then had things altered down with the seat and waist taken in. I wasn't exactly sure about the cut, and as Ed noted earlier, he's not vanity sizing these pants.
OK, I thought so
the vanity sizing is the issue - why have pants with the wrong taper so that everybody needs to size up?
I had the same trouble with Howard Yount pants - just too slim in standard sizes
here are what I would consider tapered dimensions for a size 34 pant that would be good for almost anybody:
thigh under front pocket-14