or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Shoe Damage Report & Shoe P0rn Central - Part II
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shoe Damage Report & Shoe P0rn Central - Part II - Page 417

post #6241 of 19788
m7v0jb.jpg
whiskey lhs
argyles otc
post #6242 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritzl View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Achillus View Post

Those are just shoes porn. What brand is it.

something you cannot afford...
You mean you cannot afford it. Speak for yourself. Dont speak about your salary problems on here.
post #6243 of 19788
LV Damier. My first pair of nice loafers.

Damier.jpg
post #6244 of 19788
Today:

1rfjV.jpg

and my favourite:

pOU1U.jpg

YbdlD.jpg

wHKzd.jpg
post #6245 of 19788
1950's Vintage Bostonian Alligator

IMG_3193.jpg

IMG_3199.jpg

IMG_3201.jpg
post #6246 of 19788
If those were oxfords they would be amazing.
post #6247 of 19788
2e5melw.jpg
color 8 chukka
argyles otc
post #6248 of 19788
are those black croc's ladies shoes?
post #6249 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by isshinryu101 View Post

1950's Vintage Bostonian Alligator

IMG_3193.jpg

IMG_3199.jpg

IMG_3201.jpg

The skin/book matching is so good. It reminds me of my vintage Nettletons.

5959464029_df6c69bef8.jpg
post #6250 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by eye_lip View Post

Today:


and my favourite:

pOU1U.jpg

YbdlD.jpg

wHKzd.jpg

maker??!

inlove.gif
post #6251 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickBOOTH View Post

If those were oxfords they would be amazing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by luk-cha View Post

are those black croc's ladies shoes?


These are very similar to my sentiments on these. The drawback of vintage shoes is that often the styles are just a bit "off". While some styles are truly timeless, you are often presented with an "extreme". To correct my original post, these are early 1960's, rather than late 1950's (as I originally thought). Sleeker styles were coming in vogue at that time. Note the 4 eyelet lacing & the ULTRA SLIM waist (only 2 3/8 inches). These take that style to the extreme. These are the "anti-gunboat" to be sure.


Quote:
Originally Posted by meister View Post


The skin/book matching is so good. It reminds me of my vintage Nettletons.

THAT'S why I bought them. These are some of the nicest Alligator skins i've seen. I just wish they were Tougher looking.
post #6252 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by isshinryu101 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickBOOTH View Post

If those were oxfords they would be amazing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by luk-cha View Post

are those black croc's ladies shoes?


These are very similar to my sentiments on these. The drawback of vintage shoes is that often the styles are just a bit "off". While some styles are truly timeless, you are often presented with an "extreme". To correct my original post, these are early 1960's, rather than late 1950's (as I originally thought). Sleeker styles were coming in vogue at that time. Note the 4 eyelet lacing & the ULTRA SLIM waist (only 2 3/8 inches). These take that style to the extreme. These are the "anti-gunboat" to be sure.


Quote:
Originally Posted by meister View Post


The skin/book matching is so good. It reminds me of my vintage Nettletons.

THAT'S why I bought them. These are some of the nicest Alligator skins i've seen. I just wish they were Tougher looking.

yes i know!! but having been to the shoe museum in northhamton a few times i know this is not the case so much with english shoes, but with a lot of your vintage shoes being american is seems they are alot more femine - thro the skin looks nice
post #6253 of 19788
Can you tell me how you are dating the Bostonian alligators? Is the lining half leather, half cloth? Can you tell me the inner numerical markings?

I have a pair of unworn Bostonians in shell that I think are probably around the same age. Be interested in comparing the numbers.
post #6254 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by luk-cha View Post

are those black croc's ladies shoes?

imo, the high heel leads to this impression.

they look great.
post #6255 of 19788
Quote:
Originally Posted by luk-cha View Post


yes i know!! but having been to the shoe museum in northhamton a few times i know this is not the case so much with english shoes, but with a lot of your vintage shoes being american is seems they are alot more femine - thro the skin looks nice

Come on now, that's not quite fair. The UK has CERTAINLY put out some "sex-questionable" footwear in the last 3/4 to 1/2 Century. I remember some John Lobbs (at least 5 pairs) that were on the BS last year that had higher heels than my wife's pumps. Styles change all the time, and "cutting edge" makers seem to push the envelope in an effort to lead the "style movement".

The US, as a point in fact, has actually produced some of the Roughest & Toughest shoes ever produced. Especially in the 1940's and 1950's. The 2x sole Florsheim Gunboat has lasted well over 50 years now. Thom McAn of the past made quite a few "masculine" models.

While the sleeker styles of Foot Joy, Edwin Clapp and the like were more popular (and embraced by most US makers in some form):

McAn19522.jpg


There were also some REAL "Bulldogs":

McAn1952.jpg

& THESE:

McAn19524.jpg

McAn19523.jpg

I am still searching for this Giant Muthah.


Although the style (ultra wide welt & 3x thick sole) isn't so popular now, SOME modern makers have built on this legacy...

IMG_9774.jpg

IMG_9737.jpg

IMG_9781.jpg

JM Weston 3x Sole Wingtip, which i believe, shares the same last as the legendary Chasse.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Shoe Damage Report & Shoe P0rn Central - Part II