or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Recent non-Sartorialist Looks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Recent non-Sartorialist Looks - Page 421

post #6301 of 12982
Would have been a good look had he worn proper shoes

post #6302 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by aon View Post
Would have been a good look had he worn proper shoes


Love the Empire shoes...

The bee were one of the symbol of the Great Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte...
post #6303 of 12982
I think this is a fun look for a SA in a retail store. It shows he is enjoying fashion and not taking it too seriously.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aon View Post
Would have been a good look had he worn proper shoes

post #6304 of 12982
post #6305 of 12982
^ Is that Jeremy Hackett? Classic English summery look. Very nice indeed. Looking forward to wearing similar stuff when the days get hotter.
post #6306 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ich_Dien View Post

Nice in an old fashioned way..

It can be nice in that case...
post #6307 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ich_Dien View Post

Wish I could pull that off.

The part I don't dig is the socks--too dark IMHO. Also, the shoes are a little too serious for the outfit.
post #6308 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patek View Post
Wish I could pull that off. The part I don't dig is the socks--too dark IMHO. Also, the shoes are a little too serious for the outfit.
I think it's a great example of how to pull off a light suit: make everything else CBD/soporific. Too many times a fellow thinks a light suit calls for light everything else. That way lies ice cream.
post #6309 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montauk View Post
I think it's a great example of how to pull off a light suit: make everything else CBD/soporific. Too many times a fellow think a light suit calls for light everything else. That way lies ice cream.

This is a good statement in my opinion.
post #6310 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guero View Post
Stands to reason as he's the editor of GQ, sadly.

Well called by Hendrix.
post #6311 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guero View Post
Stands to reason as he's the editor of GQ, sadly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal View Post
Well called by Hendrix.


Lol, you can see his train of thought.

1. I'll wear a cropped light gray jacket, because i'm short, and that will make me look taller. It will have skinny lapels cos the mad men look is in right now, and because i used to be skinny and that will "balance my proportions"

2. I'll wear low rise jeans because otherwise i'll look my age.

3. I'll wear a white shirt, because "a crisp white shirt always looks best" or something.

4. I'll wear a gray tie, with the collar unbuttoned to give off a "i dress up but i'm not too stiff" vibe.

5. I'll then wear a tiny tie-bar, because "it's all in the details, man".
post #6312 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketsquareguy View Post
I think this is a fun look for a SA in a retail store. It shows he is enjoying fashion and not taking it too seriously.

The shoes
post #6313 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by hendrix View Post
Lol, you can see his train of thought.

1. I'll wear a cropped light gray jacket, because i'm short, and that will make me look taller. It will have skinny lapels cos the mad men look is in right now, and because i used to be skinny and that will "balance my proportions"

2. I'll wear low rise jeans because otherwise i'll look my age.

3. I'll wear a white shirt, because "a crisp white shirt always looks best" or something.

4. I'll wear a gray tie, with the collar unbuttoned to give off a "i dress up but i'm not too stiff" vibe.

5. I'll then wear a tiny tie-bar, because "it's all in the details, man".

Yes, on that note, the chap in the shop pic above looks downright dapper by comparison. Two extremes of the J. Crew continuum.
post #6314 of 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by aon View Post
Would have been a good look had he worn proper shoes

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


This is at Sid Mashburn, right? If so, makes sense. And I'm envious that that guy can wear a dress shirt with jeans and not have it come untucked.
post #6315 of 12982
I really like the tan suit look above. Maybe lighter shoes would be better, but all in all it's great. And I like the contrast of navy socks. They echo the tie. The Sid Mashburn guy looks good too even if I'd never wear that combo. Regular loafers would be just as good to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hendrix View Post
Lol, you can see his train of thought.

1. I'll wear a cropped light gray jacket, because i'm short, and that will make me look taller. It will have skinny lapels cos the mad men look is in right now, and because i used to be skinny and that will "balance my proportions"

2. I'll wear low rise jeans because otherwise i'll look my age.

3. I'll wear a white shirt, because "a crisp white shirt always looks best" or something.

4. I'll wear a gray tie, with the collar unbuttoned to give off a "i dress up but i'm not too stiff" vibe.

5. I'll then wear a tiny tie-bar, because "it's all in the details, man".

ouch that burns.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Recent non-Sartorialist Looks