Recent non-Sartorialist Looks - Page 760
Styleforum Top Picks
LOL. You do realise that 'exclusivity' is not actually a stylistic property of the shoes, but just about price and marketing? If Nike produces only 50 pairs of really horrible sneakers 'in collaboration' with say, Lady Gaga, and puts a tag of $5000 on them, would the 'exclusivity' actually change the inherent qualities of the shoes? No. It would make them horrible, expensive exclusive sneakers. In style terms, you have to judge the shoes on their design and build not on what Nike say about them or how they market them. The Nike Yeezy's are a design disaster area; they are an inchoerent mess dreamed up a committee of marketeers. And no amount of 'exclusivity' is going to change that: even if Roger Federer was wearing the only pair in the world, they would still be bad.
Ok, ok suit, tie, beard... But, by the end of the day, don't you think they just look darn complacent? And that white buttons 2ble breasted isn't even worth of a low cost charter airline steward. Their being white is ugly enough, and makes their awkward placing all too obvious. Elegance can be extravagant or understated, rarely in between. but this isn't even in between
Hell yes, would rock the fvck out of some Gaga's, DUH.