Quote:
Yes and no. Faculty make or break it based on research and publications. So, the students who give them real relevance are their graduate students. Really, for many, if not most, faculty, teaching is considered unpleasant duty. There are exceptions (and these tend to be the engaging professors.) There is an unofficial rule at Caltech that if you get a teaching award, that you will not get tenure.
I hate the "consumer" model of higher education. It simply doesn't work.
I hate the "consumer" model of higher education. It simply doesn't work.
Does the contempt for teaching tend to vary by discipline? I have a few friends who are professors, or on that path, and they all seem to enjoy teaching as much as researching. The research is important, to be sure, but I've never gotten the feeling that they would prefer to be researchers without the hassle of teaching.
It may well be that I just happen to know academics who love to teach, but I'm just curious as to whether your experience has revealed any tendecies by discipline. It would seem to me that someone like a social scientist might be more likely to enjoy interaction with students more than, say, a chemist, mostly owing to the nature of what they study/teach.










