Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel › MIT: Land of Virgeens
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MIT: Land of Virgeens - Page 3

post #31 of 153
2/23/10 at 5:31am
OMG! what have I done?!! I just picked that pic up from google and now everyone's quoting it. it won't be long when MIT finds out who's behind this and there goes my daughter's chances of getting a full scholarship there 10 years from now.
Reply
Reply
post #32 of 153
2/23/10 at 6:08am
Quote:
Originally Posted by intent View Post
Yes, even at UCLA.
my alma mater has clearly gone downhill....
Reply
Reply
post #33 of 153
2/23/10 at 7:38am
Quote:
Originally Posted by intent View Post
Girl on far left has heels on flip flops? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of sandals? In terms of attractiveness, though, I would contend that if you were to randomly pick the same number of female college students at any other school, you'll get the same/worse results. Yes, even at UCLA.
Yup, looks like a normal assortment of college girls, but with the style sense of 7th-grade science geeks. Doll them up to typical college standards, and a decent number would look quite good.
Reply
Reply
post #34 of 153
2/23/10 at 7:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
based on the evidence at hand....means that 1 out of every 24 women at MIT is doable.
I'd bang about 10 out of the 24. The girl in the center in the first photo and about 9 out the 23 others. Granted, I'm giving the benefit of the doubt here, by assuming that all the girls we see almost nothing of (part of a face) are actually bangable. Clearly, I have lower standards than you do, feel free to mock me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asch View Post
Yup, looks like a normal assortment of college girls, but with the style sense of 7th-grade science geeks. Doll them up to typical college standards, and a decent number would look quite good.
That was indeed my assessment.
Reply
Reply
post #35 of 153
2/23/10 at 11:11am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Étienne View Post
I'd bang about 10 out of the 24. The girl in the center in the first photo and about 9 out the 23 others. Granted, I'm giving the benefit of the doubt here, by assuming that all the girls we see almost nothing of (part of a face) are actually bangable.

Clearly, I have lower standards than you do, feel free to mock me.

I see half a dozen I wouldn't mind shagging with. But, based on the action that they get, I'm not sure they'd be good laids.
Reply
Reply
post #36 of 153
2/23/10 at 11:18am
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNW View Post
I see half a dozen I wouldn't mind shagging with. But, based on the action that they get, I'm not sure they'd be good laids.

This is an opportunity


(and you'll probably need to bring a razor blade)
Reply
Reply
post #37 of 153
2/23/10 at 11:21am
This thread should be archived and catalogued as an example of Style Forum at its worst.

We can put it right between a vox thread about how Le Bernardin sucks and a foo thread on Rubinacci's rational, competetive pricing structure.
Reply
Reply
post #38 of 153
2/23/10 at 11:32am
I heard you wore a black suit to work today
Reply
Reply
post #39 of 153
2/23/10 at 11:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
I heard you wore a black suit to work today

What work?
Reply
Reply
post #40 of 153
2/23/10 at 11:42am
My best friend goes to RPI. The quality of women there is about the same.
Reply
Reply
post #41 of 153
2/23/10 at 1:01pm
That looks about right for a randomly chosen group of college girls (we aren't talking about grabbing the girls soccer team here...just every girl who lives on the 3rd floor or something). Less nasty beer bellies than I would expect at a state school too...

The right clothes would probably make a lot of them look better and a little bit of attention to detail (makeup, hair, etc) although you would probably skip that if you were going to the beach or whatever this group is doing.
Reply
Reply
post #42 of 153
2/23/10 at 3:31pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by intent View Post
Girl on far left has heels on flip flops? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of sandals?

In terms of attractiveness, though, I would contend that if you were to randomly pick the same number of female college students at any other school, you'll get the same/worse results. Yes, even at UCLA.

I highly disagree. If you walked around both schools I went to, I guarantee that you'd see a higher percentage of attractive girls than 1/24. And I didn't go to Miami, Arizona State, UCLA or Florida. The percentage of attractive girls at MIT is horrifying, at least based on that photo and the stat that started this thread (is this any surprise? The hotties weren't exactly camped out in the library at my high school, which is where you'd need to be to go to MIT). This isn't the case at many other schools.

Your arguments that these girls are effectively "fixer uppers" doesn't hold water. Sure they could be better looking, but they aren't as currently seen. That's like saying a 1967 Chevy Nova sitting in a junk yard could be nice if you restored it and repainted it. Or the equivalent to drafting Darko Milicic on the basis of his potential upside over Carmelo Anthony, Dwayne Wade, Chris Bosh, Chris Kaman, Kirk Hinrich and David West, who were going to be good right away. If you're 20 years old and in good shape as a girl, the chances of you being decent looking are actually fairly high - this photo runs counter to that.
Reply
Reply
post #43 of 153
2/23/10 at 3:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
yup agree...which, based on the evidence at hand....means that 1 out of every 24 women at MIT is doable. In this context, the virginity rate makes sense. It has nothing to do with the girls....40 percent of them are virgins because ~95 percent of them are unbonable. The fact that the other 55% still managed to get laid at all is a sad indictment on males.
100% of dudes are unbonable if you ask me. It's all a matter of perspective. also SFers seem to greatly overvalue their own attractiveness , men's image charlatan probably has some retarded article about it.
Reply
Reply
post #44 of 153
2/23/10 at 3:45pm
I have very low standards, I would bone nearly all of them.

The asian girl in the jean skirt and the guy are probably the only two I would pass on.
Reply
Reply
post #45 of 153
2/23/10 at 8:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjg22 View Post
I highly disagree. If you walked around both schools I went to, I guarantee that you'd see a higher percentage of attractive girls than 1/24. And I didn't go to Miami, Arizona State, UCLA or Florida. The percentage of attractive girls at MIT is horrifying, at least based on that photo and the stat that started this thread (is this any surprise? The hotties weren't exactly camped out in the library at my high school, which is where you'd need to be to go to MIT). This isn't the case at many other schools.

I hope you're not referring to the U of T.

Look, I have nothing other than experience and travel observations to back up my views. It's easy to hide body imperfections when you have clothes on, and women (moreso than SF men) are experts at dressing to hide flaws. The photo under discussion here is taken candidly, with the emphasis on showing a group of youngsters having fun.

What I can state with certainty is that most people in the world aren't good looking in swimsuits. Just because they go to college doesn't make it any different. Maybe all the uglier ones are hiding indoors?
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel › MIT: Land of Virgeens