Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel › MIT: Land of Virgeens
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MIT: Land of Virgeens - Page 2

post #16 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
1. i always thought Metrostyles was douchey for starting a thread called 'I don't want to bang most chicks'. Then I saw this pic.

2. WTF is that guy doing in there? He should either be front-n-fucking-center or way the hell out of there.

you calling me douchey?
post #17 of 153
no no no...i mean this pic made me realise Metro had a point. I too do not want to bang most chicks.
post #18 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidboy View Post
virjeans?


uhm, no!
would definitely smash girl at top center. most everyone else:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwilkinson View Post
That's Conne. Just before he gets on SF to tell us a story about all the "hot sorority chicks" he's friends with.
actually looks like conne

anyway, I worked with some pretty hot Wellesley girls two summers ago and a lot of them seemed to prefer MIT bros to the guys at Harvard, BU, BC, Tufts, etc.
post #19 of 153
post #20 of 153
I am wondering how the men at MIT would be feeling after the survey results came out..
post #21 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post

It has nothing to do with the girls....40 percent of them are virgins because ~95 percent of them are unbonable. The fact that the other 55% still managed to get laid at all is a sad indictment on males.

post #22 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by acidboy View Post

2. WTF is that guy doing in there? He should either be front-n-fucking-center or way the hell out of there.

When I first read this, I assumed you were talking about the dude towards the right of the photo wearing the glasses. Then I noticed that it was wearing a bikini.
post #23 of 153
im an ahole
post #24 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
no no no...i mean this pic made me realise Metro had a point. I too do not want to bang most chicks.

I'm just fucking with you. cheers!
post #25 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
yup agree...which, based on the evidence at hand....means that 1 out of every 24 women at MIT is doable. In this context, the virginity rate makes sense. It has nothing to do with the girls....40 percent of them are virgins because ~95 percent of them are unbonable. The fact that the other 55% still managed to get laid at all is a sad indictment on males.
Then again, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if you took a picture of a random collection of MIT dudes and asked women to rate their physical attractiveness, the scores would only be marginally higher... Not too many guys who were captain of the varsity football team or underwear models getting into MIT. So, I think the real story is the unreasonably high standards of ugly MIT dudes - those fellas need to put down the textbooks or the Xbox controllers, put in the contact lenses and go harpoon some manatees. Either that or MIT should permit the sale of alcohol to undergrads...
post #26 of 153
or take out the contact lenses. The less you see of that the better.
post #27 of 153
wowwwwwwwwwwwwww
post #28 of 153
I'd bone the tall blone girl in the middle.
post #29 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big A View Post
So is virginity the effect, or the cause?

it's cyclic
post #30 of 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidboy View Post
Girl on far left has heels on flip flops? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of sandals? In terms of attractiveness, though, I would contend that if you were to randomly pick the same number of female college students at any other school, you'll get the same/worse results. Yes, even at UCLA.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel › MIT: Land of Virgeens