How about the option of non-anonymous polling? Would that work for you?
Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part II - Page 892
Gosh, without even going deep into scientific articles and monographs, just recall how many times different people have referred differently to the color of something you wear. I have a jacket who some perceive as black and some as dark blue. I have another jacket that some perceive as grey and some as green. I have a blazer that some perceive as brownish and some as grey. Furthermore, some people are fucking achromates. What scientific proof do you need now?
You're trying to be a smartass here but you've just demonstrated your ignorance and stupidity. Switch from comic books to scientific magazines and you will learn lots of new things. This phenomenon has in fact been proven scientifically. Kind of grow up, as I've told you before.
P.S. Your pedantic tone is so fucking irritating.
Kindofyoung, are you really unable to notice the difference between the current context and the one within which my responses were made (out of which you just wrenched my statements for some reason)? Your sledgehammer subtlety is astonishing. Maybe this will get fixed when you kindofuclkngrowup. I'm not saying that calling someone dumb per se is unacceptable. In certain situations calling someone an asshole and a twat is acceptable and ok. However calling someone dumb because he did not think much of certain fit is not just unacceptable but simply stupid. Does that make sense to you now or I have to break it down to you the way I would do for a 3 year old?
So, I have a serious question.
There are people in certain threads who are posting semi-authoritative replies, usually regurgitating facts and photos from news searches. Yet by their profiles or history, they're not in the position to know anything about these subjects. In one case, a user persists in posting photos of watches they do not own in the watch appreciation thread. In another, a user who doesn't live in San Francisco makes posts about certain neighborhoods or transit systems and it it's clear from their profiles and posting history that they've never been there, or used that system.
These posts invariably include photos. Are they stegged? Is this some sort of spam? Are they trying to up their post count to gain privileges? Or are they just morons?
Based on your posting history, I have strong reason to believe that you've never even been on the Internet. Just another example of the problem Hayward was pointing out. (I have been on the Internet, so I can speak.)
post a better fit yourself or STFU.