Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part II - Page 763

Don't sweat it Fangy. Not everyone has your same tastes in assless androgynous women.

I've done that.. I think most do or would regardless if they care to admit it. What is the point of getting comments if you can't see what people said or questions they may ask. I don't understand the impetus for removing thumbs comments at all.... I think it's pretty lame really.

I think it depends on how you use it...

HA! So you DID watch the tutorial I sent.

Considering earlier today you implied I was a pedophile, you are one to talk. Does that maybe qualify as writing hurtful things about others? Ya, you edited it, but I read it. I replied I had a close call as a kid with a pedo. Anyone snarking now?

And, Harvey, you admitted you believe bestiality should be legal, I never accused you of being a duck-fucker, you know that. I took exception to your libertarian, anything goes belief system. Unfair to suggest I did anything different. I happen to believe animal rights matter.

If you want to post some examples of edgy commentary, please feel free, I will do the same and see where we net out. I doubt you'd reach 50/50.

Pio is just a sore-butt. I put him on ignore and he immediately ran to transparent mod because he cant take lack of attention his 'grind-you-down' posting style needs. I've tired of his act. If you notice, there are very few left of center (or even center) posters around anymore. It seems the right wing SF sperPac has wrested control. It seems they base their existence on CE right wing espousal.

While I admit readily I've been a bit mouthly lately, I've apologized and, save for 1 instance, kept my boundaries. I believe I provide good fodder in many threads. Maybe SF just wants a bunch of buahaha funny, +1, fuck taxes, she's hawt, LOL, dude bro posters. Free speech, buahaha funny if that's the case.

Should some mod believe I need a talking to, feel free to reach out over PM. I'm open to feedback. Or post an example here of crossing the line I have not admitted to. Otherwise, take a look at CE and observe the debate has died because of these guys.

And I go down with the ship before the AV goes.
Edited by idfnl - 12/4/12 at 9:23pm

Hahahahahahhaha

NO

Now you're just being coy.

Its OK, you can blame it on the Manischewitz.

Most likely due to the fact that since the election is over, the voice of opposition to status quo is always prone to get louder. That's just politics and the way of things.

I still hold that the CE would be much cleaner and respectful if the ignore/block function was a true ignore/block not just a "click here to see hidden post of guy you banned and oh by the way anyone who quotes him you must read" ignore "trick". That can't be more than a few lines of code to fix.

I guess, in reality, idfnl is a uniter and not a divider.

NO

Just let people post. If a certain someone needs to insinuate bestiality to anyone here, he tells more about himself than anything else. Giving attention to such acts might be confused with taking the poster more serious than he deserves.

Yes, but that man-cheeks avatar has got to go.

Keep the avatar. It's absolutely heinous and I think it reminds us all what we are fighting for here.

Now he's fucking up the Wine Thread. *sigh*