Originally Posted by Steve B.
Actually, I didn't...Not sure who did.
sorry, I just pasted the first post of the original thread.
Originally Posted by Jekyll
Could my name please be shortened to "J"? (Capitalized to avoid confusion, of course.)
Originally Posted by Incman
Revenue idea: charge people for name changes.
I'm going to start doing that just about now. It's getting kind of irritating. Paypal me $5 or more and you will get your name change as requested. BTW, I just noticed that it's a pretty server-intensive process to change someone's name, especially if you have lots of posts/PMs.
Originally Posted by james_timothy
So, why are there two ": What Are You Wearing Now/Today? Part II - pictures only - no discussion" threads in SW&D?
One started by kitonbrioni, the other by tonio028?
Should be fixed now - the move posts function seems to change the thread title, which is stupid.
Originally Posted by Piobaire
Is all of DT NSFW? Or is t4phage dropping a really disturbing BDSM pic into a threak cool? I'm really not sure, as DT is a bit wild...but I thought pics like this were not to be dropped in without warning?
No, it should not be any more NSFW in terms of pictures posted in-line than anywhere else. It's more about the language/humor/etc. in there. I didn't see whether it was inline or linked at first, but it's not goddamn 4chan, so I hope he didn't think it was cool to post that pic straight into a thread.
Originally Posted by T4phage
are you disturbed by LC's avatar or her sig?
nsfw tag is dead - but what is the disclaimer on the entry page of dt?
do you need a tampon?
The disclaimer does not give anyone permission to post NSFW images right into a thread. As everywhere, there is a no nudity (genitals/nipples/etc.) rule and no linking to porn.
Originally Posted by Thomas
I didn't find T4's picture all that disturbing - and as far as being revealing I've seen worse in the appreciation threads. The effect was a bit jarring, though.
Would like the nsfw tags back, if only as a warning.
The NSFW tags didn't work right - they loaded the image to your browser but didn't display it until you clicked, hence you could still get in trouble at work. People also seemed to think they were a license to post stuff that is not okay to post.
Originally Posted by spertia
There has been talk about how elements of DT tend to spill over to some extent into the main forum, dumbing down the whole board. I tend to agree. There also has been talk of shutting down DT. How about changing it so that no one can actually start new threads in DT, but rather threads can only be moved there by mods?
BUT, to keep people from starting the usual DT threads like "My Cawk Just Spoke to Me" or whatever in the main forum, there could be an automatic time-out penalty for anyone who crosses a decided threshold: X number of new threads moved to DT, X percent of threads (per day, week, whatever) moved to DT, etc.
Just a thought....
That sounds like an awful lot of work. Maybe we just have to start being more liberal with giving timeouts for being dumb outside of DT.
Originally Posted by Piobaire
I was looking for a little clarification. If the mods say that I can expect big pictures of freaky semi-pedo BDSM in DT, I'll just not go in there anymore. Don't be a fascist; I was just seeking more information.
Save the tampons for your own use.
No, that shouldn't be happening anywhere. Please report anything like this ASAP.