or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Site Topics - Part II
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Site Topics - Part II - Page 763

post #11431 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fang66 View Post

cry.gif

Don't sweat it Fangy. Not everyone has your same tastes in assless androgynous women.
post #11432 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

I can't speak for others, but I imagine many did the following, i know i did.
I did go back and check if there were any likes in my fit pics, as people often used to leave questions in the comments.
Now it would be purely narcissistic. smile.gif

I've done that.. I think most do or would regardless if they care to admit it. What is the point of getting comments if you can't see what people said or questions they may ask. I don't understand the impetus for removing thumbs comments at all.... I think it's pretty lame really. sneaky2.gif
post #11433 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambo View Post

Thumbs are for homo's.

I think it depends on how you use it... mwink[1].gif
post #11434 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

while a visual would best illustrate what exactly it is you mean, i think thumbs can be enjoyed by people of all sexual persuasions.

HA! So you DID watch the tutorial I sent.
post #11435 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey_birdman View Post

I posted a hurtful comment about idfnl, which Fang appropriately pointed out was inappropriate. So I deleted it. I've been accused of many things in my life, but as far as being accused of being an animal fucker apologist this is a first.
EDIT - And he has written very hurtful things about others. I'd never suggest a banning but perhaps a strongly worded rebuke is appropriate.


Considering earlier today you implied I was a pedophile, you are one to talk. Does that maybe qualify as writing hurtful things about others? Ya, you edited it, but I read it. I replied I had a close call as a kid with a pedo. Anyone snarking now?

And, Harvey, you admitted you believe bestiality should be legal, I never accused you of being a duck-fucker, you know that. I took exception to your libertarian, anything goes belief system. Unfair to suggest I did anything different. I happen to believe animal rights matter.

If you want to post some examples of edgy commentary, please feel free, I will do the same and see where we net out. I doubt you'd reach 50/50.

Pio is just a sore-butt. I put him on ignore and he immediately ran to transparent mod because he cant take lack of attention his 'grind-you-down' posting style needs. I've tired of his act. If you notice, there are very few left of center (or even center) posters around anymore. It seems the right wing SF sperPac has wrested control. It seems they base their existence on CE right wing espousal.

While I admit readily I've been a bit mouthly lately, I've apologized and, save for 1 instance, kept my boundaries. I believe I provide good fodder in many threads. Maybe SF just wants a bunch of buahaha funny, +1, fuck taxes, she's hawt, LOL, dude bro posters. Free speech, buahaha funny if that's the case.

Should some mod believe I need a talking to, feel free to reach out over PM. I'm open to feedback. Or post an example here of crossing the line I have not admitted to. Otherwise, take a look at CE and observe the debate has died because of these guys.

And I go down with the ship before the AV goes.
Edited by idfnl - 12/4/12 at 9:23pm
post #11436 of 15049
Hahahahahahhaha

NO
post #11437 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

Hahahahahahhaha
NO

Now you're just being coy.

Its OK, you can blame it on the Manischewitz.
post #11438 of 15049
post #11439 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by idfnl View Post

If you notice, there are very few left of center (or even center) posters around anymore. It seems the right wing SF sperPac has wrested control. It seems they base their existence on CE right wing espousal.

Most likely due to the fact that since the election is over, the voice of opposition to status quo is always prone to get louder. That's just politics and the way of things.

I still hold that the CE would be much cleaner and respectful if the ignore/block function was a true ignore/block not just a "click here to see hidden post of guy you banned and oh by the way anyone who quotes him you must read" ignore "trick". That can't be more than a few lines of code to fix.
post #11440 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piobaire View Post

Could we please ban this idiot? I'm fine with him talking shit about me but he's just blathering indiscriminately with anyone that lets reality intrude upon his delusional mania.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fang66 View Post

Not often I agree with Pio, but idfnl is a complete tool. Maybe not ban, but certainly some consequences for this post and the like seems appropriate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal View Post

Yeah, and I never agree with Fang, but idfnl needs a good talking to. Maybe make him change that av. as penance?

I guess, in reality, idfnl is a uniter and not a divider. laugh.gif
post #11441 of 15049
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal View Post

Now you're just being coy.
Its OK, you can blame it on the Manischewitz.

NO
post #11442 of 15049
Just let people post. If a certain someone needs to insinuate bestiality to anyone here, he tells more about himself than anything else. Giving attention to such acts might be confused with taking the poster more serious than he deserves.
post #11443 of 15049
Yes, but that man-cheeks avatar has got to go.
post #11444 of 15049

Keep the avatar. It's absolutely heinous and I think it reminds us all what we are fighting for here.

post #11445 of 15049
Now he's fucking up the Wine Thread. *sigh*
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Site Topics - Part II