• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The WAYWT Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

BreezyBirch

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
3,200
Reaction score
5,400
haha

that is a total fortune outfit. silent t-shirt from gilt, OG (read:OG) GATs (50 bucks?), and wvg knickers? broke the bank! (nohate to cocacolabear)
 

Binker

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
653
Reaction score
6
i dont know what the **** those shorts are supposed to be but they look awful and the justification for sizing down on them is almost as laughable as the idea that anyone would wear those out in public in the first place
 

colabear

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
1,941
Reaction score
3,554
honestly the pants looks like a girls leotard and it looks feminine because there's no bulging at the crotch

I will not post my outfits here because obviously my fits are not tight fitting because I'm not in perfect shape right now. And it will just be a gang bang.

Also, in my opinion, I have not seen anyone who I think is credible enough here to make fashion analysis.
 

KitAkira

Wait! Wait! I gots an opinion!
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
8,589
Reaction score
118
haha

that is a total fortune outfit. silent t-shirt from gilt, OG (read:OG) GATs (50 bucks?), and wvg knickers? broke the bank! (nohate to cocacolabear)
And you are?
 

APK

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
10,274
Reaction score
11,146

honestly the pants looks like a girls leotard and it looks feminine because there's no bulging at the crotch

I will not post my outfits here because obviously my fits are not tight fitting because I'm not in perfect shape right now. And it will just be a gang bang.

Also, in my opinion, I have not seen anyone who I think is credible enough here to make fashion analysis.


1) You don't know what a leotard is.
2) By your logic, if a guy's crotch doesn't resemble this, then the pants are too feminine.
3) Acting as though people here only post outfits featuring tight fitting clothing is a straw man argument. Plenty of people post WAYWT contributions with an anti-fit silhouette.
4) What exactly makes someone credible to make a "fashion analysis"?
5) No one here would ever want to be involved in any gang bang that you are a participant in.
 

BreezyBirch

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
3,200
Reaction score
5,400
? was responding to cola's analysis re it costing a fortune. i ain't no one
 

I<3Bacon

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
1,848
Reaction score
348

colabear, why don't you post your fits in this thread instead of the no discussion one, would be a lot more fun


Um... wow. I agree. notwithit, if you are affected by this attack on your fit in any way, shape, or form, take a quick peek at your attacker on the last page of the no discussion thread and sleep easy tonight.
 

KitAkira

Wait! Wait! I gots an opinion!
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
8,589
Reaction score
118
1) You don't know what a leotard is.
2) By your logic, if a guy's crotch doesn't resemble this, then the pants are too feminine.
3) Acting as though people here only post outfits featuring tight fitting clothing is a straw man argument. Plenty of people post WAYWT contributions with an anti-fit silhouette.
4) What exactly makes someone credible to make a "fashion analysis"?
5) No one here would ever want to be involved in any gang bang that you are a participant in.
Why did I click that link?

Quote:
? was responding to cola's analysis re it costing a fortune. i ain't no one
Aw ****, multiquoted the wrong post (was in response to his "Not qualified to fellatio a porpoise" point). No hate, homie

It may be the drank, but I feel a little bad for the inevitable shitstorm headed his way. He did come in here guns blazin though
 
Last edited:

A Fellow Linguist

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
2,370
Reaction score
4,244
Colabear raises and excellent point. Notwithit has no bulge and always blocks his face. Or should I say HER FACE?!

also
it77M.jpg
 

APK

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
10,274
Reaction score
11,146

Colabear raises and excellent point. Notwithit has no bulge and always blocks his face. Or should I say HER FACE?!

also
it77M.jpg


colabear appears to be bulging everywhere BUT the crotch region.
 

BreezyBirch

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
3,200
Reaction score
5,400
aw cmon, alex p keaton, that's just not nice....only otter is allowed to comment on people's weight

/pages otter

500 post coming up. just keep editing this post...
 
Last edited:

colabear

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
1,941
Reaction score
3,554

1) You don't know what a leotard is.
2) By your logic, if a guy's crotch doesn't resemble this, then the pants are too feminine.
3) Acting as though people here only post outfits featuring tight fitting clothing is a straw man argument. Plenty of people post WAYWT contributions with an anti-fit silhouette.
4) What exactly makes someone credible to make a "fashion analysis"?
5) No one here would ever want to be involved in any gang bang that you are a participant in.


1) yes I know what a leotard is. he looks like a ballet dancer with a super tight fitting pants
2) I'm not saying that a guys crotch should be bulging for every pant he wears. However, in this particular tight fitting knit pant, the crotch looks flat and it looks like he doesn't have a manhood thus making it look feminine.
3) From my observation, the majority is yes. everything is black, tight fitting, and by certain brands that get high praises. However, for something that doesn't look like the norm, for example an Uncontrol outfit, it gets gang banged by insults.
4) Someone who works in fashion in real life. not just a sales associate but someone in the creative side
5) I'm not a ***** you know. you took gang bang the literal way, it's a methapor. heck I wouldn't even let anyone use my own straw for sipping and to think that I would participate in a gang bang with you is beyond me. Why what do you think of yourself, are you Jude Law? You are disgusting, Yuck. you need to get away from where you are right now because obviously, you are hallucinating
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 45 40.5%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 44 39.6%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 5 4.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 18 16.2%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 25 22.5%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
504,422
Messages
10,573,936
Members
223,687
Latest member
corcelleglauru
Top