or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The WAYWT Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The WAYWT Discussion Thread - Page 5655  

post #84811 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renalan View Post


Does that mean we can touch dicks now?

post #84812 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelyork View Post

If I was owner of this forum, I would demand a tribute from Suspension Point, for all the free advertising, even shilling, that their merchandise gets on this forum teacha.gif

Joseph should definitely be paying affiliate fees because a lot of dudes were crass enough to mention on here that they bought stuff from his shop.
post #84813 of 117677

KOY always had potential..I could tell by one of the very early fits he posted (everything fit nicely, good choice of colors).

post #84814 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoreman1782 View Post

I don't know what to make of this
Look out, bad 90s comedians are stealing your jokes

I should have been born a two decades earlier. I'd be cutting edge.

Experiment failed frown.gif
post #84815 of 117677

i hate those pants, sorry

 



(psssst...Tanner now's your chance!)

 

 


Quote:
Originally Posted by Raindrop View Post

KOY always had potential..I could tell by one of the very early fits he posted (everything fit nicely, good choice of colors).

blush.gif

post #84816 of 117677
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by recondite View Post

 

Uh...... here's the deal: your legs are short relative to your body, they are foreshortened by the angle of the camera, or both.

 

So, wearing shoes or boots lighter than your pants, like you did earlier, is a bad look for you.

 

Untucking your shirt is a bad look for you.

 

And finally, cuffing your pants is a bad look for you.

 

To look your best, you need to tuck in your shirt, uncuff your pants, and wear shoes or boots the same tone as your pants or darker; otherwise, your legs will look unattractively short compared to the rest of your body.

 

This is especially true when you dress with a top and bottom that are contrasting in tone.

 

It will be less true if your top and bottom are monochromatic, such as with a suit, or least the same in tone, such as a dark tone top or sweater with jeans or trousers of a different color; e.g., black sweater and new denim jeans. When your top and bottom are monochromatic or of similar tone, such as when wearing a navy lounge suit; pick only one of the following items that may visually foreshorten your legs: shoes/boots lighter than pants, socks lighter than pants, cuffs on pants 1.5" or less, or untucked shirt that is hemmed to maximize apparent your waist height.

 

Your two best options are to cuff your pants or wear fun socks, but not at the same time.

 

Any shirt you wear untucked should be hemmed square to end at just low enough to cover your beltline, which should be at your the level of your navel; i.e., long rise pants.

 

Going further, according to the pictures you have supplied, you will always look better in a bomber style jacket compared to a pea coat, car coat, or parka of similar length. You will always look better in long rise pants or jeans compared to low rise jeans. You will always look better when you keep all the patterns and color in your outfits on your torso compared to bold patterns and colors on your legs. You will always look better with darker trouser and lighter top, than the opposite. V-neck sweaters will always look better on you compared to crew neck or turtleneck sweaters, unless the turtleneck is very light in color and layered under a V-neck garment like a cardigan or an open darker jacket that creates a V look.

 

Just my opinion based on what might be an unflattering camera angle or your phenotypic expression. Cheers!

 

 

Great critique!

post #84817 of 117677

omg

 

post #84818 of 117677
That is not the fit that will save this thread from its recent detour toward Shitsville.
post #84819 of 117677
ElisiX, don't take this place too seriously and really just do what you want, when I started all I got was "boring", "basic", "expensive basics", I pretty much did what felt good and made me happy, it has worked out pretty nicely, but I tend to go against most of everything that is thumb-upable here

Speaking of wearing the same thing





Mug Shot T
Midnight Blue OverDyed Jeans
Split Leather Belt
Favorite Footwear at the Moment
(Maison Martin Margiela)

Cola and Stripe 0425
(Cutler & Gross)
post #84820 of 117677
tanners had his chance about 100 posts ago

if there is one thing true about SF its that if there are more than 50+ new posts in less than a day, they are not fits.

thanks for the feedback guys! think those pants are salvageble at all or not?

I might have them just tapered below the knee if there is no alternative, and have them just be a pair of slim fit trousers. The materal is very nice!
post #84821 of 117677
sorry, but that's horrible bene
post #84822 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyc wid it View Post

That is not the fit that will save this thread from its recent detour toward Shitsville.

I think it's the welcoming committee.
post #84823 of 117677
Bene please re-evaluate your recent outfits and purchases frown.gif I see a mid-90's figure-skater in those outfits

edit - and not in a good way
post #84824 of 117677
will do, back to the lurk smile.gif
post #84825 of 117677
Regis have you seen any nice black MMM belts this season?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The WAYWT Discussion Thread