or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The WAYWT Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The WAYWT Discussion Thread - Page 4998  

post #74956 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by volchok View Post

I always take it as a sign of victoy when people move on to the ad hominem.

See, disregarding the rest of the post and going for a small excerpt that acted as an introduction may fly in the retardcore (I just made this up, this is the intellectual world where guys like you live) circles you frequent, however more astute readers will note you did not address my main criticism. I could also add that this wasn't an insult but merely an objective description of how fucking stupid you are being.
post #74957 of 117666
(I've never told another user to stop posting, but...)


Volchok quit posting; you're derailing the possibility of anything remotely worthwhile happening in this thread. Which is to say—in words you might understand—that you objectively suck at this.
post #74958 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewho13 View Post
Volchok quit posting; you're derailing the possibility of anything remotely worthwhile happening in this thread. Which is to say—in words you might understand—that you objectively suck at this.

 

And that is a cold, hard scientific fact.

post #74959 of 117666
Time for the ol' banhammer to be dropped on Volchok
post #74960 of 117666
Why would you think that? He's been pretty civil considering all the shit you guys are giving him for no reason. Don't even get why this started but hardly blame him for trying to stick up for himself
post #74961 of 117666
As has been said before (although maybe in fewer words with a different emphasis), it's a matter of the smarmy, authoritative, self-righteously conservative demeanor that you might find in the most detestable individuals from groups as polarized as, for example, fundamentalist Christians and the Reddit atheist assholes.
post #74962 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewho13 View Post

As has been said before (although maybe in fewer words with a different emphasis), it's a matter of the smarmy, authoritative, self-righteously conservative demeanor that you might find in the most detestable individuals from groups as polarized as, for example, fundamentalist Christians and the Reddit atheist assholes.

Rational!!
Natural!
Objective!!
(the feeble cries of the retardcore crew)
post #74963 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuuma View Post

See, disregarding the rest of the post and going for a small excerpt that acted as an introduction may fly in the retardcore (I just made this up, this is the intellectual world where guys like you live) circles you frequent, however more astute readers will note you did not address my main criticism. I could also add that this wasn't an insult but merely an objective description of how fucking stupid you are being.


Your main criticism is profoundly idiotic.
Make a good argument instead of insulting others and you might be taken a little more seriously.
post #74964 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by volchok View Post
Make a good argument instead of insulting others and you might be taken a little more seriously.

 

Actually, Fuuma is taken quite seriously here. Mainly because he dresses well, and what's more he can explain why - both of which are rather important on a forum about style.

 

Volchuk, if I were you, I would step back from the argument - it is pointless. The only way you'll get some respect here is by reading and listening for a while, posting some interesting and thoughtful comments, and perhaps a few fits. Coming on strong is always going to annoy people - even if you were right.

post #74965 of 117666
But you see, fuuma has clout because he has a history of demonstrating good taste and sound aesthetic judgement. For a variety of reasons that you refuse to listen to, these are things that matter in the forum.

i should remind you the value system of what matters to people here has been established long before you wandered to the forum. Most of the things people value, despite what you may believe, are designed so that users can get the most use out of the forum.

Good fits, thoughtful comments, and a general history of positive contribution--these are the things that matter. and give the user license to fling around a few insults. Throwing a self-centered shit-fit and derailing a thread is looked down upon, as is acting authoritatively when you have no clout.

(edit: KJ beat me to it)
post #74966 of 117666
this picture doesn't have any clothes in it. nor is it from today. but it's a picture.

lifestyle featuring papa-art

post #74967 of 117666
You could have said the rick shorts and dunks were hidden by the kayak

I would have believed you
post #74968 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBD View Post

New jeans
nl8cR.jpg
To hem or not to hem?

I vote hem, assuming you've washed them (NS, I assume?) and gotten all the shrinkage out. Your style is pretty consistently "tidy business casual" (in the best sense of all three words) and cuffs look better, I think, with the nice footwear that you favor.
post #74969 of 117666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1 View Post

I vote hem, assuming you've washed them (NS, I assume?) and gotten all the shrinkage out. Your style is pretty consistently "tidy business casual" (in the best sense of all three words) and cuffs look better, I think, with the nice footwear that you favor.

From the looks of the denim its not NS, maybe LVC?
post #74970 of 117666

 

 

COS

OL

Uniqlo

Loake

 

(sleeves look a little short cause I'm sitting down)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The WAYWT Discussion Thread