am i doin it rite?
sorry 4 bad qualityclose-up of shoes (Click to show)
main difference is that if I see bows, I am like oh, now that is one sexy motherfucker, I would fuck him in the ass.
moo has perhaps an air of boss authority that comes across in work related pornography, but that's mostly it.
TL;DR MC is focused on looking good in a business setting, while SW&D is more focused on what looks "good" overall--which makes things more messy, but has the added benefit of including the base reality of how your clothes look and whether or not they are attractive to the average, fashionless street bystander.
Yuh, Steve Maddens.
edit: omg nvm i just realized what it said. yeah i guess they're sneaker oxfords.original post (Click to show)
oxfords? i thought those were dressy shoes?
my boyfriend called them top-siders too but i thought that was what boat shoes are called....
if anything i would call them sneakers
I don't want to reopen the circus about what is wrong with Mr Moo's fit, others have added bits and pieces over the past few pages and taken together, there is a good assessment of what's wrong...but I just want to state here and now, clearly, unequivocally....there is no way that fit would be considered admirable on Wall Street, The City, or anywhere else like that...and yes, grooming and clothing are immeasurably important in the work world in North America and Western Europe, and even moreso in other parts of the world....Mr Moo's fit would be considered foppish, pretentious, and dare I say, bizarre, in any serious professional work environment where attire and grooming counts and where wearing whatever you want to suit your personality doesn't quite fit the mould...and if as Mr Moo says he's 29, doubly so...
Mr Moo's fit may be considered highly stylish at the Moscow International pimp and mafia convention, but that is a far far far cry away from Wall Street...