or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The WAYWT Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The WAYWT Discussion Thread - Page 4234  

post #63496 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuji View Post

IMG_0629.jpg
Not a proper WAYWT because its just lounge wear. I know a lot of tall people with large drops have a really hard time finding basic V neck T shirts that fit well that aren't $200 designer ones so I thought i'd let people know that the tall slim fit old navy ones fit really well and they're on sale for like $6. Not SF approved, but I think they look good. I don't know how the short sleeve ones fit yet, long sleeves are good though.

damn nukka you got phat.
post #63497 of 117677
cdhagg - you're doing pretty damn good.



pretty damn good if you're trying to look like generic meterosexual guy. what exactly are you trying to go for?
post #63498 of 117677
RUB THESE NBs IN YOUR FACE

1385297
post #63499 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post

prkr307-1.jpg
prkr307b.jpg
another suit day. boiled wool + mohair ringjacket suit. mtm mandarin collar shirt. docs. zissou belt. hand roll cuff.

i want to be you when i grow up inlove.gif
what docs? did you paint the sole black?
is this ringjacket?
http://www.ringjacket.co.jp/
Quote:
Originally Posted by notwithit View Post

CDH:
- Shirt too shiny.
- Pants too low-rise for tuck.

agreed. the silky fabric of the shirt doesnt go well with the rough texture of the denim. melonade said it, go with an oxford smile.gif
post #63500 of 117677
I know Parker has a lot of SW&D cred but I don't think that suit looks good. I feel like the belt almost hitting the button is really throwing things off. The pants should be lowered a bit.
post #63501 of 117677
Something from last Sunday's stroll.

428
post #63502 of 117677
wish I was working from home so I could wear this again

R5x9n.jpg
post #63503 of 117677
what jeans? looks good
post #63504 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubblyMasquerade View Post

damn nukka you got phat.

Visible abs and quad vascularity, fat indeed.
post #63505 of 117677
yet again, the concept of fat on this forum. but why do your forearms look so skinny?
Edited by Coldsnap - 3/9/12 at 9:17am
post #63506 of 117677
Got no idea, grip isn't weak. Was shrugging 120kg for reps double overhand today with no straps and I can deadlift like 190kg now. I think its because I have very large hands, so I don't need to make an effort to really squeeze the bar and I can just let it wrest on my finger tips instead.
post #63507 of 117677
have you been doing exercises for your cheeks too?


edit: the ones on your face
post #63508 of 117677


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by derrida26 View Post



was going to post more hate but ehh, what's the point

 

Good for you!  Compassion is the new fashion at WAYWT...

 

post #63509 of 117677
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmanxl View Post

i want to be you when i grow up :inlove:what docs? did you paint the sole black?is this ringjacket?

hahah, you mean a raffish slacker with a clothing obsession? ;-) docs are the jeffrey model. they have a slimmer profile than the 1460s and no yellow stitching. the sole is still that neutral semi transparent rubber. i think they just look black. and yeah, that's the same ring jacket. japanese co. makes southern italian-esque suits often with weird fabrics. more about it here. run it thru google translator for japanglish explanation. I guess it's a mohair-flannel, but it has that same wrinkly, bubbly quality of boiling. it's also unfortunately kinda itchy-n-skratchy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brad-t View Post

I know Parker has a lot of SW&D cred but I don't think that suit looks good. I feel like the belt almost hitting the button is really throwing things off. The pants should be lowered a bit.

I agree with you.. pants are riding too high in the photo. This is not my fave suit, I prefer a lower rise and slimmer cut. Or else super loose. This is sort of an in-betweener silhouette.
post #63510 of 117677
 
Originally Posted by aether View Post

cdhagg - you're doing pretty damn good.
pretty damn good if you're trying to look like generic meterosexual guy. what exactly are you trying to go for?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmanxl View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by notwithit View Post

CDH:
- Shirt too shiny.
- Pants too low-rise for tuck.

agreed. the silky fabric of the shirt doesnt go well with the rough texture of the denim. melonade said it, go with an oxford smile.gif



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDHagg View Post

350x233px-LL-5fca059f_2012-3-8_001.jpeg
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

350x525px-LL-50b8d684_2012-3-8_002.jpeg

Sag your jeans and throw those boots in the trash, I'm tired of seeing them.
And if you're going to wear a button up with jeans, make it an oxford or something, not so dressy. Top and bottom halves are incongruent


Thanks for the comments everyone. 

 

I didn't really think of the versace-esque shiny shirt as "dressy," but maybe I'll have to rethink where I can use the shirt.
 

Aether: I don't really know where I'm going with this.  I think I have some vague idea of how I want to dress, with words like "sleek" and "sexy" attached.  Maybe I've been reading too much GQ, or watching too many Armani runway shows.  confused.gif 

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The WAYWT Discussion Thread