• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The WAYWT Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

melonadejello

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
3,055
Reaction score
5,174
Originally Posted by noobizor
Unless this guy's a proven troll or something, I'd like to know this too -- especially after receiving such vicious reactions when commenting on clothes and status. Ie you must not understand 'quality' when questioning the value of those affiliate brands advertised up top^^. Yet when someone truly wealthy comes along, look how easily those same egos get bruised; look how fast their tune changes!

Because he looks like ****.
 

Jekyll

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
6,166
Reaction score
21
Originally Posted by noobizor
Unless this guy's a proven troll or something, I'd like to know this too -- especially after receiving such vicious reactions when commenting on clothes and status. Ie you must not understand 'quality' when questioning the value of those affiliate brands advertised up top^^. Yet when someone truly wealthy comes along, look how easily those same egos get bruised; look how fast their tune changes!

Did you look at those pictures?
confused.gif
It doesn't matter how much the clothes cost. He coulda bought them from Walmart. He'd still radiate douchiness.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by lmaozedong
no, but the fact that you assume this does. also your jeans fit and look terrible, coat would be much better one size down but is a pretty nice piece nonetheless..

your cologne and bottled water collection does not impress me


The jacket is a size medium. Small would be, well, too small. Thanks.
 

noob in 89

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
11,325
Reaction score
15,612
Originally Posted by Jekyll
Did you look at those pictures?
confused.gif

You don't see the same kind of vitriol directed at others, though. (And all that from a buncha ultra-conspicuous consumers themselves, even if they don't like to think in those terms). That's why I wondered if he was perhaps a habitual troll.
 

coldforge

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
I like to imagine that he posted that picture of all those perfumes because he's actually wearing each one of them at the same time in the fit pic that he posted.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by notwithit
Yeah, the only thing I find objectionable (other than the preponderance of man-perfumes) is the excessive pre-fading on the jeans. They don't actually fade halfway down your shins in real life. They look a tad oversized, too, but maybe that's intentional.

edit: I also dislike chunky watches - it looks like you're overstating a superfluous piece of jewelry - but that's my personal preference.


Yeah, the fading stops at about 4 or 5 inches down my knees. I don't think that they're oversized, though. Also, the watch is not that chunky. I guess the zoomed picture of the watch makes it look that way. It's exactly the same size of the watch that I posted yesterday.
 

coldforge

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by JasonCali
The jacket is a size medium. Small would be, well, too small. Thanks.

I'm sure it's a very nice coat but right now it looks both too bulky and also kind of awkwardly tight and pulling"”which means that it's really not appropriate to be worn over a chunky knit and/or you need to lose some weight to wear it. It looks too big around the shoulders but also much too tight across the chest and in the sleeves"”a shortcoming which is accentuated by the thick wool sticking out at the wrist and the gigantor super crowded watch.

The jeans just need to go; the wash is pretty ugly and artificial looking, but they also just look really big on you. As for the shoes, the giant logo is pretty ugly, so I'm not sure I'd like them in anything; but aside from that, as noted, the color of the shoes completely clashes with everything else going on there. Grey jeans and black shoes or dark blue jeans and brown shoes would go a long way.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by ZhiMingBuFanDe
if you don't mind me asking, what season are those DH jeans? That's a pretty damn generous cut.

It's from S/S 2011. I just bought them the other day.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by diamonds
JasonCali - the whole knock knees thing isn't going to work in your favour if you want to continue wearing pants. might i suggest a thom browne skirt? also coat looks a bit too small to wear the sweater underneath. the jeans are the only thing that looks inherently bad though. i would try some slimmer black jeans but i dunno ... might look odd with your leg shape.

also i'm jealous of your goyard


Thom Browne skirt? Yeah, not gonna happen. I'm not "****." No offense. Well, it was so cold today, so the thick sweater was a must. Noted, I'll wear darker jeans next time. Thanks. : )

Haha, thanks.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by dsoren
I have nothing wrong with listing brands. Your problem is that you obviously buy **** purely because it's designer...yet the two fits you have posted have been absolutely terrible. I literally had no idea it was possible to spend so much money and look so bad.

The jeans are ill-fitting and the huge white fades look like ****. You are wearing a rugged-preppy looking sweater with ghetto high-tops, and that makes absolutely no sense. I'm thinking that jacket cost you, what, 5k? Doesn't look like it. You are also wearing a pretty decent watch with some ugly hook bracelet thing that looks like it's from A&F.

My biggest problem though is that half of the pics you have posted haven't been fit pics. This thread is called "What Are You Wearing Today," not "What kind of faux-baller **** do you drop ridiculous amounts of money on." We don't need to see pictures of your (ridiculously too large) cologne collection, your Swarvoski jolly rancher bowl, your multiple blackberrys, and definitely not your black card.

I will say that I like those Tom Ford frames...


Wow, harsh much?
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by Makeshift_Robot
Lots of people angry at a guy for being wealthy & conspicuously displaying his wealth. It's good that he's into fashion.

The fit itself is not too good jasoncali, the straight/baggy prewash jeans and beige shoes are a pretty unflattering combo, and that's a really unattractive watch, looks like some Fossil type ish. The painting behind you looks really cool. We don't need to see your designer water or your jolly ranchers.


Thanks.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by G0079
Yeah, I don't dig the watch at all...thing's massive and tacky. Another vote for different Jeans, or maybe ditch the jeans and go with some sort of chinos. The top half looks good, but the pants and shoes just murder the fit.

Thanks.
 

JasonCali

Active Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by coldforge
I like to imagine that he posted that picture of all those perfumes because he's actually wearing each one of them at the same time in the fit pic that he posted.

You devil you! How do you know?
laugh.gif
(I'm not!).
 

Brinbro

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
732
Reaction score
5
JC, my man, don't feel the need to respond to everything posted about you - especially with a separate post for each.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,873
Messages
10,592,589
Members
224,337
Latest member
pdsanbvha
Top