The WAYWT Discussion Thread - Page 1574

what are the shoes.

i thought kent was back because he asked to be back

Is the coat single breasted or double breasted? I really like this.

Aether, dope pants/shoes combo. I dont really like the jacket in the context though...

today

Great vest. Where from?

Also, there's something weird about the jean stack... something... can't really put my finger on it right now since I'm kind of *blah* from work...

I'll get back to you. >_>

@indesertum: oh well, they're Zara
one of the two decent zara shoes I've seen so far, with leather soles (and I might say, I paid them nothing, more or less)

@listi: single breasted
it is a COS (Collection of Style) coat
not sure how many people know about COS, because it is an European thing
basically, COS is owned by Hennes and Mauritz, better known as, well, you know, H&M
better materials, desing and cuts than H&M

Thanks, Vest is Zara. Yeah staacks around knees are a bit baggish from the pic probably the way i was standing (locked-knee)

are these the unbranded ones from UO? I have a pair of those, they fits pretty well actually for the price. I want the grey ones they have out now.

It's not about money. It's about developing your eye. A key point that no one has raised so far is proportion. You are wearing a pencil-thin tie, with a very loose shirt. The shirt could be acceptable (bar the colour, sorry!) in a more conservative outfit, with a proportionally wide tie. With the skinny tie, it just looks way off.

Today:

Apartment lobby, before discovering that for the first time this week it's cold and grey:



Fred Perry / APC petit standards / Keds

After:


Earth Crisis hoody / Dad's old swandri.

yeah the vest is nice. It looks kinda like the W + H one although i dont think it is. Them hem of your jeans looks weird and after seeing them a few times im not keen on your sneakers.

yeah.. i'm not keen on them either.. looking to get a new pair, but not sure what yet.. so these are my black pair for now

the hem is a stock hem (apc denim)

Was thinking it was W+H. But he said it's Zara. Not as good *cough* but still nice.

As I've explained before this is a storage room filled with various instruments (including a piano against the other wall) and misc junk that I plan to get rid of. But I'm incredibly lazy so nothing has happened yet. The cheesy 1980's hotel style flowers in the gold vases were gifts from my mother in-law. Not the best place, but I often take pictures here since it's the only full length mirror I have in my house. Why are so many people here fixated on critiquing where a picture is taken and if the style matches the clothing? For example, once someone lobbed a ridiculous comment against Snake by pointing out his carpet and floorboard trim looked cheap relative to the Julius pieces he was wearing. If you want to buy into this line of reasoning, then here's some other things to consider.... 1. Do you live in an apartment? In most places in the US (outside of NYC), only poor people live in apartments. Not baller! 2. What kind of car to you drive? Do you drive some cheap little Japanese or European cracker box car when wearing your expensive pieces? Or perhaps you drive an SUV, just like soccer moms? Not baller! 3. Are you posting pictures of yourself to an Internet forum where 90% of the members dress poorly? Not baller!

Hahaha, Kelvin had it right.

I lol'ed.