• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The WAYWT Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

toothsomesound

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
5,096
Reaction score
440
Originally Posted by GraphicNovelty
GATs look bad in a lot of fits because tan/white sneakers don't look good at the bottom of dark pants/denim with small hems and no cuff. Look at Mikey's last fit with the vans authentics.
(I don't think white achilles lows look that good at the bottom of unfaded uncuffed raw denimz either.)


this is just wrong, someone post a fit
 

shaftoe

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by StanleyVanBuren
cA1Lv.jpg



Stanley that spread color makes you look even more pencil-necked. No hate.
 

GraphicNovelty

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,486
Reaction score
2,945
@ARW:
Originally Posted by BB1
2. Brand new looking raw denim combined with brand new looking luxe sneakers When a clothing item looks overly new it naturally draws more attention to itself than a weathered item would. Thus, we have both the jeans and sneakers drawing us in to be noticed as "new". But unfortunately this extra attention tends to aid in revealing the disconnect between the sporty/luxe sneakers and workman like (anti-luxe) fabric. Another observation is that the most celebrated posters here appear to largely (or perhaps totally) avoid the raw denim + sneakers pairing, yet this is a favorite combo for noobs. Why is that?
You can replace "luxe" with "boxfresh" Basically, IMO, boxfresh white sneakers "pop" a lot as is, and when placed against something like dark denim, and especially when the hem is really small, they pop even more. But they're plain looking. So the aesthetics sneakers have this weird tug of war between "LOOK AT ME" and "I AM SO UNDERSTATED" With a cuff or heavy fading of the jeans when the sneakers are beat up or when the hemline isn't so tiny it's different. I think this looks funny:
012-4.jpg
Compared to jeans without a small hem and CP's that aren't so bright looking
sgsmte.jpg
But you are welcome to prove me wrong.
 

toothsomesound

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
5,096
Reaction score
440
dude just look at sufu, black or raw skinny jeans + white sneaks is classic, some people don't like it but it's pretty much standard. please don't use BB1's sad rhetorical attempts at rationalizing his weird prejudices and neuroses
 

GraphicNovelty

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,486
Reaction score
2,945
Will you accept aegelus' sad rhetorical attempts at rationalizing his weird prejudices and neuroses
Originally Posted by aeglus
I find brand new sneakers really throw a fit off. Kelvin's mmms looked way too new in his fit (still looked good though). I don't go out of my way to get them dirty but they look better after being worn in the rain a few times I think.
But i think we just have different aesthetic preferences. I guess we can just put this down to a difference of opinion then.
 

Lane

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
5,236
Reaction score
784
I agree with andrew, black jeans + white shoes has always been a common style. I think it looks fine, but yah its nothing special I think that's obvious nonetheless.
 

toothsomesound

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
5,096
Reaction score
440
dude you went from "tan/white low sneaks + small hem dark jeans = bad" to "boxfresh **** + small hem = bad". doesn't matter much, it is I think kind of an opinion thing but at least be consistent with what you're trying to say. also I'd be willing to bet the opening on aeglus' jeans is pretty much the same (within .5 inch, i'd wager aeglus' are 7.5 or 7 and the other guys are maybe a half smaller but probably the same) as that other guys you posted. Aeglus' hem is just longer so it stacks and looks more voluminous but the opening is probably pretty close. are you trying to say low tops need stacks? dunno.
 

dfagdfsh

Professional Style Farmer
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
22,649
Reaction score
7,932
lol. ive been wearing gats for like.. years now. so have a lot of people on sf. the only ones that are hyped are the ugly ass MMM ones.
 

GraphicNovelty

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,486
Reaction score
2,945
Originally Posted by AndrewRyanWallace
dude you went from "tan/white low sneaks + small hem dark jeans = bad" to "boxfresh **** + small hem = bad". doesn't matter much, it is I think kind of an opinion thing but at least be consistent with what you're trying to say. also I'd be willing to bet the opening on aeglus' jeans is pretty much the same (within .5 inch, i'd wager aeglus' are 7.5 or 7 and the other guys are maybe a half smaller but probably the same) as that other guys you posted. Aeglus' hem is just longer so it stacks and looks more voluminous but the opening is probably pretty close. are you trying to say low tops need stacks? dunno.
I guess my issue is the clean break between the jeans and the sneakers draws attention to the light shoe/dark jean contrast that i find aesthetically displeasing. Things that decrease the contrast (fading, stacking, cuffing, wider hems on the jeans, dirtier sneakers) make it look better, at least to me, while things that increase the contrast (darker jeans, clean break, small hems, brighter white on the sneakers) make it look worse (again, at least to me)
 

dfagdfsh

Professional Style Farmer
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
22,649
Reaction score
7,932
the basic ones are nice but nobody buys the plain ones, they always buy the ugly colors because that's what gets marked down
 

dfagdfsh

Professional Style Farmer
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
22,649
Reaction score
7,932
also those mmm mids (non gat ones) are the ugliest shoes ever, and every week someone is like oh **** they cost $299 for nutsack grey im gonna buy it!! and they are just bad.
 

jet

Persian Bro
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
22,391
Reaction score
11,133
Funny bc I think non-mmm look like **** having seen both side by side.
 

dfagdfsh

Professional Style Farmer
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
22,649
Reaction score
7,932
i have owned both and i think mmm make your feet look tiny in a bad way
 

pfurey

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
853
Reaction score
39
Originally Posted by jet
Funny bc I think non-mmm look like **** having seen both side by side.
+1 non-mmm gats look like wrestling shoes, brah.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.3%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,443
Messages
10,589,445
Members
224,245
Latest member
glucofortplus
Top