Thoughts on my dream home design (Colonial French-Cambodia)

Below is a very rough sketchup design of my dream home, which I was thinking of building either on land as shown or over water on a riverfront lot. I was wondering if I could get your thoughts on 1. what style does it appear to you? (despite the fact I already labeled it french-khmer), and 2. do you like it?

So basically I've been to Southeast Asia lot and I really liked the colonial bungalows there (British or French), but I also like the indigenous Thai or Cambodian style stilt house. I thought I'd merge the two here. I'm also a real fan of arched spanish courtyards... so I thought I'd combine 3 stilt houses to get that effect in the house below. I love plants, so in the final design there'd be vines all over the place and tree canopies brushing up against the windows/roof. Exterior is a rough burnt sienna stucco/adobe (like in the california missions).



Inspiration (colonial SE Asia, Thai stilt house, cal mission):

It would be in a rural area with not many houses around, and I'd be sure to plant lots of hardy palms around it

Below is an example of a modern Thai house that is similar to my design. Mine would be constructed similarly but of course the details would be different- more stuccoed arches and verandas, use of wood instead of plastic for the window casings/roofing joists, etc. These houses are built with concrete post and beam consturction... I assume the pillars in my design would have to be of concrete, or dock pilings if I build over water , but the rest of the house could be usual 2x4 stick frame construction like average american homes. Yes, it will cost a fortune but the extra labor involved in getting details built (like the virtually non-existent covered porch in modern mchouses) will hopefully give the house lots of character.

Backwoods of western oregon actually the porches will only be useful 2 months out of the year but that didn't stop the craftsman style in seattle.

I've actually been to the Thompson house a few times, it is indeed stunning, especially the interior. But I don't think I follow you on the context point- it's not the 95 degree temperatures and shrieking cicadas that make the thompson house attracitve, it's a singular visual experience for the most part: if they packed up the whole house again and dropped it in the woods in oregon, it wouldn't be any less beautiful right? What makes a McMansion is not the context, but the cheap 'home depot' materials used (worst among them are plastic windows, and composition siding (t1-11)). Any new house will look a bit McMansiony even if you used all natural wood and traditional techniques (I've seen it new 'traditional' Thai homes outside bangkok, or all-natural adobe houses in NM) but that's just because it hasn't aged yet, where a lot of the character comes from. I plan on expediting that process as much as possible- there are molds you can buy to spray on the stucco to age it, recycled dried timbers you can use for roofing joists, etc just as examples. By the way, the thompson house and what many people consider traditional "Sukothai style" has many features that aren't traditionally Thai at all (and thus out of context)- the inversion of the exterior wall to the interior, victorian alcoves, and overly carved gables are examples. Yes that's a good point- actually even if I put it on land I can plant a garden or something below the house and thus double the size of the yard. There are environmental setback rules for building near water though, which applies to the riverfront lot I'm considering, so for that lot it has to be built on dock pilings over water or nothing. Though that is not all bad- I look forward to growing vines off the balcony and then opening my bedroom window to swing off them into the water below.