There is a difference between a sworn statement that you got served (someone says he mailed it), and the physical accomplishment of service (you received it). In hindsight, some jurisdictions passed ass-covering laws that prevent you from suing them for falsely swearing to service. But that doesn't mean they are free to harm you. The summons are processed by machines; no natural person can testify that he or she remembers handling the summons that was sent to you. They know this in advance. Their proof of service is nothing more than a computer file with some code that says they set up a mailing label generating program to take a bunch of names from some files. Since so many people ignore jury duty summons, they can't show a high statistical probability that you received it.
Lawyers always mystify law--and do so on this thread by ridiculing members who point out simple loopholes in the law. Yawn. Get over it.
Lawyers always mystify law--and do so on this thread by ridiculing members who point out simple loopholes in the law. Yawn. Get over it.






