Quote:
Originally Posted by
Thomas 
LOL - I dl'd the tracks I wanted off Tripod from iTunes, so I'd never lose that. Now I have to lose both a laptop (which I have done before), and a backup drive (three, actually) in order to properly lose Tripod again.
Between the heavy and acoustic sides, I don't know that I have a preference. There's a lot of spillover between the two sides so their sensibilities aren't completely abandoned, and I kind of like knowing that they have a balance between the two, and have the balls to put out records that reflect that. As for Facelift, I've not spun that one in forever, and the last time I did I thought it too 'shiny' or produced. I thought Sap and Dirt were the beginning of the band's honest and thoughtful efforts.
Well thanks for destroying my Alice in Chains theory.

I definitely like the acoustic stuff, and I really respect the fact that they were talented enough to do it, but, even as I get older, I just can't help but love the heavier stuff more. It's like the old pizza analogy - there's good pizza and great pizza, but there's really no such thing as bad pizza. There's no bad Alice in Chains, just varying levels of awesome.
My only complaint about
Facelift is that there was a pretty good dose of 80s that somehow got mixed in, and that gave it the shiny/produced feel you mention. They pretty well got rid of that feel by
Sap and
Dirt, which, I think, made them both sound more earnest. There are some gems on
Facelift - "Bleed the Freak," "We Die Young," and "Sea of Sorrow" in particular - but it definitely wasn't as consistent as
Dirt. I agree 100% that
Sap and
Dirt were the sound of the band hitting its stride musically.