• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

3d Tv

imageWIS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
19,716
Reaction score
106
With all the wide-spread talk about 3D TV being the future, will anyone actually put on 3D glasses at home while watching TV? What happens if you flip to a non-3D channel? Are you then going to remove your glasses to watch that channel and then to put them back on if you flip to another 3D channel? I find the whole idea very
facepalm.gif
.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
There are currently displays that do not require glasses but they only really work from one viewing angle. These will be refined and eventually you won't need the glasses. Whether you want it or not, everyone from the content producers to CE companies are pushing it, and I'm going to bet there's a lot of new content in the pipeline. I think that in a couple year's time, you won't be able to buy a new TV or blu-ray player without the 3D functionality included. I personally wouldn't bother with glasses for regular TV, but for certain movies, I would. And then there's gaming which is naturally suited for it.
 

thekunk07

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
18,117
Reaction score
3,247
i am having a hard time not seeing 3-d as some 50s anachronism. will probably be cool in execution though.
 

Harold falcon

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
32,028
Reaction score
11,364

Bradford

Current Events Moderator
Joined
Mar 19, 2002
Messages
6,626
Reaction score
228
These new 3D networks sound cool.

I just wonder how long it will take to roll out the technology.

I saw hi-def demonstrated at the National Association of Broadcasters convention in 1989 but it hasn't been until the past few years that HD has become commonplace.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
^^ The difference is that adding 3D to a HD tv doesn't add a lot to the cost. Going from SD to HD was a much bigger deal. The panel technology is now cheap and affordable. The modifications needed to add 3D are basically small tweaks, and that's why it's going to roll-out a hell of a lot faster imo. Also, this time, everyone is behind it, and there will be no format war. The standard for 3D blu-ray discs has already been set. HDMI 1.4 is going to start rolling out this year. If they get their ducks in a row fast enough, they can still take advantage of the fact that most people are only just starting to upgrade to HD. The first step is glasses. This will hook people. The second step will be to sell everyone a 3D set that doesn't require the glasses in 10 years time or whatever.
 

JayJay

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
24,297
Reaction score
439
Originally Posted by GQgeek
^^ The difference is that adding 3D to a HD tv doesn't add a lot to the cost. Going from SD to HD was a much bigger deal. The panel technology is now cheap and affordable. The modifications needed to add 3D are basically small tweaks, and that's why it's going to roll-out a hell of a lot faster imo. Also, this time, everyone is behind it, and there will be no format war. The standard for 3D blu-ray discs has already been set. HDMI 1.4 is going to start rolling out this year. If they get their ducks in a row fast enough, they can still take advantage of the fact that most people are only just starting to upgrade to HD. The first step is glasses. This will hook people. The second step will be to sell everyone a 3D set that doesn't require the glasses in 10 years time or whatever.
Having to wear the glasses would kill it for me. Still sounds interesting though.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
I really don't see the big deal with wearing the glasses. You're in your home, presumably in the dark watching a movie, not outside walking around. All the 3D TV's shown have used active shutter glasses, which are supposedly much easier on the eyes than the ones you may have used in theaters. The average movie is what, an hour and a half long? Anyway, I think that gaming is going to sell this more than anything else. There are already tons of games out that are 3d. I think that existing games will need to be patched, but the hard work (the actual content) is mostly done.
 

tagutcow

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
625
Originally Posted by GQgeek
I really don't see the big deal with wearing the glasses. You're in your home, presumably in the dark watching a movie, not outside walking around. All the 3D TV's shown have used active shutter glasses, which are supposedly much easier on the eyes than the ones you may have used in theaters. The average movie is what, an hour and a half long? Anyway, I think that gaming is going to sell this more than anything else. There are already tons of games out that are 3d. I think that existing games will need to be patched, but the hard work (the actual content) is mostly done.

Wake me when they start making 3D Appreciation.
 

Aaron

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
2
I was in Taiwan recently and they're already selling tv's with 3D capability (without having to use glasses). The resolution is pretty bad so they're gimmicky more than anything else. I can see the potential though.
 

turboman808

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
856
Reaction score
0
sounds kinda gimcky to me.

Now when will I be able to have a holodeck?
 

Psyren

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
392
Reaction score
0
The biggest issue is that you'll need a 3D TV, especially since it took years for consumers to go HD. Companies are throwing 3D at us now and 3DTVs and dvd players will be out in Spring of this year. I just bought my HDTV one year ago for 2k and I sure as hell am not buying another 2-3 thousand dollar 3DTV until another 4-6 years and I'm sure that's what'll be up with the lot of folks. If you can a 3D component to your HDTV then that's another story.
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
Originally Posted by Psyren
The biggest issue is that you'll need a 3D TV, especially since it took years for consumers to go HD. Companies are throwing 3D at us now and 3DTVs and dvd players will be out in Spring of this year. I just bought my HDTV one year ago for 2k and I sure as hell am not buying another 2-3 thousand dollar 3DTV until another 4-6 years and I'm sure that's what'll be up with the lot of folks. If you can a 3D component to your HDTV then that's another story.

HD penetration is only at 34% as of the end of 2009. It's starting to pick up speed now because the panels are now cheap enough for po' people and people that don't care too much about their TVs. By the time that number reaches the levels of SDTV, I think that a large segment will have the 3d functionality incorporated whether they know it/like it or not and anyone else, if they haven't upgraded in the meantime because they're nerds like me, will probably be looking to upgrade at that point. In the meantime, the display technology (without glasses) will keep evolving, more film/TV content will be produced (there's already tons of videogame content), etc.

That said, with the exception of gaming, I'm not sure how impressive 3D will be on the 40-50" screens that most people have. The whole point of 3D is immersion and unless you're sitting very close to your screen, you don't get very much immersion out of a regular TV. I JUST bought a 1080p projector, so I'll probably not be upgrading for 4-5 years, but when I do, it will be a 3D capable one. I'm also going to hold off on a preamp until hdmi 1.4 is settled.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 37.0%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.6%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,854
Messages
10,592,560
Members
224,335
Latest member
stevieglovesphilc
Top