or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment and Culture › Sherlock Holmes?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sherlock Holmes? - Page 3

post #31 of 95
Looks incredibly stupid. I haven't ever, and probably will never watch a Sherlock Holmes movie. The books are so special too me I'm terrified a film may ruin it.
post #32 of 95
Is it just me, or is this threak a study in this board's latent (or not so latent) Anglophilia?

Would everyone be this up in arms if the tale being butchered was, say, the Epic of Gilgamesh? The story of the Battle of Thermopylae?

For what it's worth, I think this Holmes film looks like a bloody travesty.
post #33 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by zjpj83 View Post
Jeremy Brett FTW
Brett was undeniably great as he brought mischievousness to Holmes but Rathbone was . . . well, Rathbone. For more on him see my sword fight threap. lefty
post #34 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teacher View Post
It looks like utter garbage to me. I'll pass.

+1
post #35 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyJ Maduro View Post
Is it just me, or is this threak a study in this board's latent (or not so latent) Anglophilia?

Would everyone be this up in arms if the tale being butchered was, say, the Epic of Gilgamesh? The story of the Battle of Thermopylae?
.

No, because those stories are not nearly as widely read and reproduced in various media. The Holmes stories, while possibly waning in popularity right now, have been wildly popular for over a century. Now, if a movie were to butcher something like or Mark Twain, we'd be having the same discussion, country of origin notwithstanding.
post #36 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyJ Maduro View Post
Would everyone be this up in arms if the tale being butchered was, say, the Epic of Gilgamesh? The story of the Battle of Thermopylae?
As I recall more than a few people were put off by 300. I can't speak for the rest of the board but the hollywoodization and bastardization of classic myths such as the Epic of Gilgamesh is rather aggravating.
post #37 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal View Post
As I recall more than a few people were put off by 300. I can't speak for the rest of the board but the hollywoodization and bastardization of classic myths such as the Epic of Gilgamesh is rather aggravating.

I never really mind it, actually. Whether it's a movie based on history or a novel, I never go in with the expectation that it'll stick right with the original. I'm impressed when it does and still delivers a good movie (Apollo 13, for example), but movies are entertainment, period. A couple of good examples for me would be Bridge on the River Kwai and Gangs of New York: both inaccurate as hell but still good movies. I also don't at all mind it when moviemakers reinterpret literature, and I even quite like some of these movies (Starship Troopers was nothing like the book, and it wasn't a GREAT movie, but it was fun). However, I just don't like it when they take something I like very much and turn it into a steaming pile of suck.
post #38 of 95
I guess I'm with you there. I don't mind if a story is reinterpreted or used as inspiration as long as the movie is good. I can't stand when a classic idea or character is just turned upside down and loses all of the feeling of the original. That's when I have to wonder why they even bothered to have source material to begin with. If you are going to use Thor as a character, make him a damn thunder God or don't bother. A good example of a movie I thought was not really like the book in content but clearly inspired visually and in tone is Where the Wild Things Are. Really just an original piece of work only loosely based on the book but good enough that I didn't feel like Jonze had tried to destroy my childhood. An example of the Job done wrong would be the Wizard of Earth Sea sci-fi channel adaptation. Just a fucking insult to a good bit of fantasy. This Homes looks like it's in the same territory.
post #39 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teacher View Post
I just don't like it when they take something I like very much and turn it into a steaming pile of suck.

What they did to John Irvings "A Prayer For Owen Meany" was criminal.
post #40 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyJ Maduro View Post
Is it just me, or is this threak a study in this board's latent (or not so latent) Anglophilia?

Would everyone be this up in arms if the tale being butchered was, say, the Epic of Gilgamesh? The story of the Battle of Thermopylae?

For what it's worth, I think this Holmes film looks like a bloody travesty.

Dude, I used to love that stuff as a kid and there is no way to classify me as an Anglophile (hmm well, maybe musically see punk/post-punk but I also like US early NYC punkers so...).

The TV series was good. I even like the Miyazaki animated version w. dogs. This movie looks like generic action crap.
post #41 of 95
Soviet Sherlok Holmes is the best.
They showed it on PBS a few years back. Absolutely book-like with great score and costumes.
post #42 of 95
Thread Starter 
Just a few more thoughts on this thread:

As far as Holmes' knowledge of martial arts goes, Holmes told Watson that he had used the Japanese art of baritsu to hurl Professor Moriarty into the chasm of the Reichenbach Falls. I just asked my colleague Dave Cater, editor of Inside Kung-Fu, if he had ever heard of a martial art called baritsu. He said he had not. In the movie, Dave informed me, Holmes states that he had been studying Wing Chun (a real martial art) for four years.

I suspect "baritsu" may have been a figment of Doyle's creative imagination. Doyle was very free and easy about making up stuff like that. For example, the "swamp adder, the deadliest snake in India" in "The Speckled Band" is otherwise unknown although people have tried to identify it with the Russell's viper or the banded krait. Doyle obviously didn't know squat about snakes: You can't train a snake with a whistle, they're deaf, and they don't drink milk. The term "Penang lawyer" for a cane weighted with lead seems to have been made up by Doyle. In one of the stories, Dr. Watson mentions using a gun called a "tiger cub." Neither I nor yet my pal Garry James, who knows a great deal more than I do about British firearms of the Victorian era and is quite a Holmesian into the bargain, had ever heard of such a gun.

For all the reverence paid to the Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce Holmes movies, bear in mind that in some ways they do more violence to the stories than the current movie. They yank Holmes and Watson out of the late Victorian era and plunk them down in the 1930s and '40s. In at least one of the movies, Holmes is fighting the cruel Nazis, with whom Professor Moriarty has allied himself. I can recall Holmes expressing his amazement to the evil professor that even he could stoop that low! Mind you, it has probably been about 57 years since I was watching those movies on TV!
post #43 of 95
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherlockian View Post
The Valley of Fear is a really good SH story, well worth a read.

...In which Sherlock played virtually no role at all!
post #44 of 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLibourel View Post

For all the reverence paid to the Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce Holmes movies, bear in mind that in some ways they do more violence to the stories than the current movie. They yank Holmes and Watson out of the late Victorian era and plunk them down in the 1930s and '40s. In at least one of the movies, Holmes is fighting the cruel Nazis, with whom Professor Moriarty has allied himself. I can recall Holmes expressing his amazement to the evil professor that even he could stoop that low! Mind you, it has probably been about 57 years since I was watching those movies on TV!

My mom loves those movies and has tried practically my entire life to get me to love them, too. I just can't, for those reasons and just because I thought the acting was so stiff.
post #45 of 95
I thought 300 was a bunch of crap as well. I forgot out The League of Whatever the Hell Was That Piece of Crap (OMFG)....so Holmes uses deductive reasoning to box? Ugh...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment and Culture › Sherlock Holmes?