or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment, Culture, and Sports › The Davinci Code
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Davinci Code - Page 3

post #31 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arethusa
I'm boycotting this crap.

I do not support bad writing.

So who and what do you read?
post #32 of 117
It was shown in Cannes. Critics in the room snickered, apparently. They interviewed a few people as they exited the theater, and comments went:

"I was so bored."
"It goes too fast, no time to develop the characters."
"Wasted my time."
"well, it was... executed."
post #33 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tck13
...I did think the book brought up some interesting points about Christianity, some interesting points of view I never thought of or heard about....

P.S. Why can't the church acknowledge what it is... a fictional book?
I don't speak for 'the church', however Brown has played both sides of the issue of fiction. He makes several claims of "FACT" in the front of the book, however his claims of fact are not true. When cornered on his claims of fact he takes the dodge that it's just a book of fiction. He acts as though it's a historical novel, a fictional story woven around true events. Except the events aren't true.

As you yourself acknowledge in the first statements I quote above, his work of fiction brought up interesting points you've not thought of before. That's fine, but I would say that confirms the validity of interest many have in demonstrating Brown's factual errors.

Again, I would suggest Salon's 'The Da Vinci Code Crock' as an article that tackles the factual problems without what many would view as Christian baggage.
post #34 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabienne
It was shown in Cannes. Critics in the room snickered, apparently. They interviewed a few people as they exited the theater, and comments went:

"I was so bored."
"It goes too fast, no time to develop the characters."
"Wasted my time."
"well, it was... executed."

I read the book on an airplane as well - and had the same reaction to the book as these people did to the movie. Boring, no character development and a waste of time. It seemed to be clearly written with a film screenplay in mind.

Perhaps when it comes out on DVD we will rent it. Until then, I really don't care.
post #35 of 117
I'll be busy alphabetizing my canned goods.
post #36 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by LabelKing
Well, Dan Brown is no Umberto Eco.

No one is like Umberto Eco...

Just as long as they never cast Christian Slater again in one of the adaptations of his novels, I'm a happy man!

Jon.
post #37 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnapril
I'll be busy alphabetizing my canned goods.

I'll be busy canonizing my canned goods.

Jon.
post #38 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve B.
I DID read it on an airplane.

I AM reasonably intelligent (Shut up Bill).


The fact that we've gotten to the point of preemptively telling Bill to shut up is both humorous and sad at the same time.

Jon.
post #39 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tck13
P.S. Why can't the church acknowledge what it is... a fictional book?
Because if people are allowed to read and criticize one fictional book, they might start criticizing others, like, oh I don’t know this book: Jon.
post #40 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanC
Again, I would suggest Salon's 'The Da Vinci Code Crock' as an article that tackles the factual problems without what many would view as Christian baggage.

No offense to you AlanC, I respect whatever view you may have on Religion but...

That article has more holes in it than the TDC. Although, it does kinda make me want to read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail".

I think the farther I get from religion, the closer to God I get.


Edit: hmmmmm. Maybe a new signature???
post #41 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by imageWIS
Because of people are allowed to read and criticize one fictional book, they might start criticizing others, like, oh I don't know this book:



Jon.

Dammit!!!! I am sure that's a pic of the bible but my work computer won't let me see it.

Could it be........
















Satan?
post #42 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tck13
Dammit!!!! I am sure that's a pic of the bible but my work computer won't let me see it.

Could it be........

Satan?



Jon.

(I changed the pic, it's a lower quality one now, however, which is of course the work of Satan)
post #43 of 117
I'm looking forward to this movie....i've owned the book for a couple years but haven't ever bothered to start reading it. But i do enjoy films/stories about the greatest fictional historical character, Jesus.
post #44 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger02
I recommend The Rule of Four as a better book in the genre. The jacket calls it a cross of Eco and Brown. It's more Brown than Eco.

Tom


Oooh, I just listened to this on audio book (so shoot me I have a 2 hr commute roundtrip) and it is REALLY good. I really liked it.

Not quite on par with my favourite Foucault's Pendulum (which I'm sure I just spelled wrong), but it was good.

Won't see The DaVinci Code simply because the "art historian" keeps calling him DaVinci rather than Leonardo.

bob
post #45 of 117
Quote:
How The Grinch Stole Christmas.

I forgot about that one...

I would think it'd be pretty difficult to improve on Seuss" original.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment, Culture, and Sports › The Davinci Code