Quote:
Originally Posted by
tigerFormula 
The talk "wack as fuck" at hypebeast, but they do have a point. I really hope dry denim doesn't become some hipster thing now.
It has been for ages. Don't you live in LA?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
slide13 
Ummm...are people really that concerned about the patch going over that seam? If so....there are a lot of jeans out there that have that going on.
True, but my point was this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mlyngard 
I think they meant the poorness of the application of the patch, how it's thin and stretches over the waistband seam.
That patch looks like a piece of nylon than it does leather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mlyngard 
But don't we when we buy APC, or more especially, KMW, Samurai or (name another Japanese brand)?? That's a pretty common markup in the garment industry, isn't it?
You mean retail markup isn't 2.2-2.4??? MIND BLOWN. No, I meant that knowing how UO operates, especially in-house brands, they could be selling these jeans for $40 RETAIL but thrown in the selvage buzzword and they suddenly have to be priced comparatively to Gap, Good Society, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KitAkira 
Well look at the yoke itself, it's a straight line. All other examples you posted have a proper carrier that angles up. Now look at the UO jeans, nearly straight across. That means that the patch is massively oversized in order to go across it. While the brands you chose tend to use large patches, they look nowhere near as big as the UO patches (although this could just be due to the fucked up proportions, it'll still look weird)
I could be wrong but this was the impression I got, too. Something just looks off.