or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I - Page 65  

post #961 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by amerikajinda View Post
+1. it was getting redundant.

Oh, the irony.
post #962 of 9842
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawyerdad View Post
If that's the standard, we may as well all pack up and go home right now. Although I hadn't looked at it in a couple of days, based on the way things were going I can only assume that the problem was that it got redundant, but that it got (more) juvenile, hateful, and generally offensive.
Yep. That was a sad thread. In the future please keep stupid, hateful, juvenile, pathetic comments off those threads.
post #963 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by j View Post
Yep. That was a sad thread. In the future please keep stupid, hateful, juvenile, pathetic comments off those threads.

I'd like to quote this for emphasis. There is really no reason to broadcast to the world that you are an idiot.
post #964 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Guy View Post
I'd like to quote this for emphasis. There is really no reason to broadcast to the world that you are an idiot.

As my old man used to say "Don't advertise your ignorance."
post #965 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by j View Post
Yep. That was a sad thread. In the future please keep stupid, hateful, juvenile, pathetic comments off those threads.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Guy View Post
I'd like to quote this for emphasis. There is really no reason to broadcast to the world that you are an idiot.

Another point is that this is Style Forum, and an awful lot of the comments in that thread displayed a distinct lack of tact and want of style.

It's really a shame that that thread had to be put out of its misery. We should all be able to celebrate women of all shapes and sizes. Women also read the forum, and I'm sure that thread helped a lot of them feel like shit, which is not the kind of help anybody needs.
post #966 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nantucket Red View Post
Another point is that this is Style Forum, and an awful lot of the comments in that thread displayed a distinct lack of tact and want of style.

It's really a shame that that thread had to be put out of its misery. We should all be able to celebrate women of all shapes and sizes. Women also read the forum, and I'm sure that thread helped a lot of them feel like shit, which is not the kind of help anybody needs.

What's worse is that most of the guys posting on that thread are probably not studs themselves that are scoring the likes of the skinny models that they like to oggle over. In fact, some of those guys would be lucky to score any kind of girl - fat or skinny.
post #967 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by odoreater View Post
What's worse is that most of the guys posting on that thread are probably not studs themselves that are scoring the likes of the skinny models that they like to oggle over. In fact, some of those guys would be lucky to score any kind of girl - fat or skinny.
Well in fairness, I think that thread was divided across the board in terms of idiocy: 1/3 high functioning autistics clouding the thread with bizarrely misogynistic interpretations of women + 1/3 internet "white knights" who, ironically, choose to base their conceptions of masculinity in terms of their (percieved opinion of) what outside women think of them, and 1/3 thread starter with an established reputation of being a horrible attention seeking troll = recipe for disaster. Still, it was a fun read while it lasted.
post #968 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by aybojs View Post
Still, it was a fun read while it lasted.

I couldn't disagree with your more. It was misogynistic and ugly.
post #969 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by aybojs View Post
Well in fairness, I think that thread was divided across the board in terms of idiocy: 1/3 high functioning autistics clouding the thread with bizarrely misogynistic interpretations of women + 1/3 internet "white knights" who, ironically, choose to base their conceptions of masculinity in terms of their (percieved opinion of) what outside women think of them, and 1/3 thread starter with an established reputation of being a horrible attention seeking troll = recipe for disaster. Still, it was a fun read while it lasted.

Whatever. The thread was taken down solely because of those being dicks.
post #970 of 9842
At least once a day, I get a server busy message.

Usually it clears in about 1-5 minutes.

Are others experiencing this?

Is there anything I can do on my end to lessen this?

Thanks,
rnoldh

BTW: I just read the above post( #961) concerning this problem. It pretty well answers my question.
post #971 of 9842
I know J already answered it but i figured i'd tell you that you're not alone. Once or twice a day it does that for a few minutes.
post #972 of 9842
Spoilt asparagus begins to stink after a while.
post #973 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJman View Post
Spoilt asparagus begins to stink after a while.

You are what you eat.
post #974 of 9842
The Cheney in 1994 thread has been sent to the trash, for good reason. The Bush-Nazi connection discussion can be opened in a new thread if you guys like, but the ad hominem in that thread as it stands is taking up more space than actual discussion.
post #975 of 9842
Mack11211 seems to have been banned, but says he doesn't know why.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I