or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I - Page 498  

post #7456 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by edmorel View Post
I don't get requesting pics of a dude's schlong, particularly if said dood first posts a pic of himself in a dress Maybe I'm too old school and this is something that the youngsters (and foo) regularly do now.

"what up dude"
"nothing"
"got a pic of you weiner?"

+1 Agreed

Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophe View Post



+1. I think that Rach's intuitions about this kid were correct.

+1
post #7457 of 9842
maybe we should just close DT.
post #7458 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by m@T View Post
maybe we should just close DT.
Gee, whatever do you mean? [/wallogina threak] Anyway, closing DT won't really solve the problem of bad judgment; it will just result in people posting weird/nasty shit in regular forums.
post #7459 of 9842
I was honestly shocked by the thread. Way, way, way over the line.

I found out last night that even Reddit has a CP (well, post-pubescent at least) reddit. Was thoroughly disgusted. I think the official reaction to CP and the like has been over the top in recent years, but at the same time, people need to play by the fucking rules. I don't care what your justification is. Adults looking at the genitalia of individuals under the age of 16 is fucking wrong.
post #7460 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by rach2jlc View Post
Gee, whatever do you mean? [/wallogina threak] Anyway, closing DT won't really solve the problem of bad judgment; it will just result in people posting weird/nasty shit in regular forums.
and then we'll ban them and they won't say 'but it's dt where anything goes, where's ur sensahumor man?'
post #7461 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by m@T View Post
maybe we should just close DT.

+1
post #7462 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by m@T View Post
and then we'll ban them and they won't say 'but it's dt where anything goes, where's ur sensahumor man?'

Why is it so difficult to understand that DT is not a license to post something that would otherwise be impermissible to post?
post #7463 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by unjung View Post
I was honestly shocked by the thread. Way, way, way over the line. I found out last night that even Reddit has a CP (well, post-pubescent at least) reddit. Was thoroughly disgusted. I think the official reaction to CP and the like has been over the top in recent years, but at the same time, people need to play by the fucking rules. I don't care what your justification is. Adults looking at the genitalia of individuals under the age of 16 is fucking wrong.
There was bad judgment on that thread, I agree. HOWEVER, the people on the thread in question had no idea... and still don't.... how old the OP was. He could be a troll. As the thread continued, it was my intuition that the OP perhaps had some problems and may not have been of age, at which time I tried to change the direction of the thread and mentioned as much. It was then (rightly) squirreled. I agree that the thread was over the line, but before you go being all "Won't you think about the children!!?!"... a little focus/reality helps. As well, I will recap the thread because I think some members are blowing things out of proportion. 1) Junior member posts "Do you like my dress?" in DUMB THREADS. It's a pic of a person of unknown gender wearing a women's pantsuit/skirt. First few posters assume it is a girl. 2) Someone mentions that the member is male (from reading another thread). Then some member makes the joke about "proving" it. 3) OP SAYS "Pic Sent" on the forum. 4) Several members think this is a joke and, in DT, make some dumb comments like, "OH really, lemme see!" 5) Turns out it wasn't a joke. The picture was forwarded to me by another member (NOT the oP). The pic was not nude, nor was there any way to determine age or anything. It was a pic of a pair of underwear, basically. 6) OP then mentions he is having some issues with gender/identity problems and appears NOt to be a troll and maybe has some real problems. 7) The thread gets squirreled. SO, in short, nobody was trying to promote kiddy porn, soliciting it, nor approving of it. I think EVERYBODY thought the "Pic sent" was just a Dumb Threads joke. Let's end it before it gets more blown out of proportion.
post #7464 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambulance Chaser View Post
Why is it so difficult to understand that DT is not a license to post something that would otherwise be impermissible to post?
I don't know if anyone really reads the rules. Hell, I haven't. I once received a time-out for posting visible vag in a thread (it was a painting, but whatever). So I figure you just have to label it as NSFW. Also you can swear. Both seem reasonable. Exchanging or inciting children to post photos of their genitalia isn't just distasteful and across the forum line, but also illegal. I don't see the issue here. -Don't post genitals or nipples; -If you link to them, use an NSFW tag; -No over-the-top avatars; -Don't do shit that's illegal, for Christ's sake.
post #7465 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by unjung View Post
Adults looking at the genitalia of individuals under the age of 16 is fucking wrong.

I couldn't agree more. Being a Mother, even the thought of this makes me feel sick.
post #7466 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by rach2jlc View Post
...

This is fair, you're right, you didn't actually expect to receive real photos of a kid's dick, and I'm sure you did have honest intentions. I think there were some other posters there who were actively encouraging it, however. And if the OP was a troll, they were over the line from the beginning.
post #7467 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by unjung View Post
This is fair, you're right, you didn't actually expect to receive real photos of a kid's dick, and I'm sure you did have honest intentions. I think there were some other posters there who were actively encouraging it, however. And if the OP was a troll, they were over the line from the beginning.
+1. Like I said, not a good showing by anybody. Hopefully this, and the wallogina threak, will show all of us to be a little more careful, not just in what we post, but in how we "joke" around and implicitly encourage activity we wouldn't otherwise.
post #7468 of 9842
that kid posted his age in response to my question in the sleeping with friends thread.
post #7469 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by unjung View Post
Adults looking at the genitalia of individuals under the age of 16 is fucking wrong.

Why is 16 your magic number? What about 17? What about 15? What if standards are different in another country or another time? What if I looked at them 20 years ago? [/Roman Polanski Threadtrolling]
post #7470 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas View Post
Why is 16 your magic number? What about 17? What about 15? What if standards are different in another country or another time? What if I looked at them 20 years ago? [/Roman Polanski Threadtrolling]

threakcrapping in Transparent Mod thread = autoban
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I