or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I - Page 134  

post #1996 of 9842
He should have just posted with the new account when drunk. Maybe that would have been enough of a distinction.

Then again, probably not

P.s. do they make any Breathalyzer ignition lock-out devices for keyboards?
post #1997 of 9842
preface - I don't really know what I am talking about here.... Hey J, I have just spaminated iPhone/Sidekick etc seller number 9053 for the week....is there a way that we can build in filters so that if a single post has certain words in it, it gets marked as instant spam. eg - if it has, say, Nokia repeated 10 times in a single post, also contains the word Vaio more than 5 times, iPhone, discount, and an email address from someone with less than five posts...something like that...the filter snags it and marks it as spam instantly? Obviously (as someone who just started an iPhone thread) we wouldnt want it to be too sensitive as there are legitimate phone and laptop threads...but if it is one of those "contains x AND y AND z AND a" type conditions, it could save us all some irritation and/or work.
post #1998 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoSurface View Post
Oh Conne, making another account to avoid the ban. Suck it up boy!

lol
post #1999 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoSurface View Post
Oh Conne, making another account to avoid the ban. Suck it up boy!

ah, glorious schadenfreude!
post #2000 of 9842
J,

Any chance we can put the kibosh on the f-ing RickRolling? It's getting a little annoying.


b
post #2001 of 9842
should be punishable by death.
post #2002 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdawson808 View Post
J,

Any chance we can put the kibosh on the f-ing RickRolling? It's getting a little annoying.


b

Quote:
Originally Posted by m@T View Post
should be punishable by death.

Nawww... He's just upset cause I rickroll'd him earlier!
post #2003 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwilkinson View Post
Nawww... He's just upset cause I rickroll'd him earlier!

Yes, and it's getting tiresome. It's like some 5th grade prank. Grow up.

b
post #2004 of 9842
Can somebody change Artisan Fan's user title to "A+ in Science"?
post #2005 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdawson808 View Post
Yes, and it's getting tiresome. It's like some 5th grade prank. Grow up.

b

Yeeeeeesh calm down. Is it really that upsetting to you to think you're clicking a real link and being redirected to youtube? It's a joke.
post #2006 of 9842
Another reason to turn the speakers down at work.

Though I did like the Rick Astley pie chart I saw the other day. LMAO
post #2007 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by amerikajinda View Post
ah, glorious schadenfreude!

+ a trillion

On a serious note however their absence has allowed SF to be quite readable the past few days. In threads were personal attacks would have normally broken out by now (like the Catholic Church thread on the CE forum); the discourse has been quite polite and adult. And while, yes there are of course disagreements, everyone has stayed inside the zone of proper etiquette and care. I dare say that SF is more viewable today than it has been since time immemorial.

Jon.
post #2008 of 9842
If I wanted viewable, I'd go to nytimes.com or the wall street journal.
post #2009 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by imageWIS View Post
+ a trillion

On a serious note however their absence has allowed SF to be quite readable the past few days. In threads were personal attacks would have normally broken out by now (like the Catholic Church thread on the CE forum); the discourse has been quite polite and adult. And while, yes there are of course disagreements, everyone has stayed inside the zone of proper etiquette and care. I dare say that SF is more viewable today than it has been since time immemorial.

Jon.

I did not find that Ed or Connie made reading SF difficult or unpleasant. That has nothing to do with whether they should be on leave for some offense or another, but if people are keeping track of who thinks their absence has made SF a better place, don't count me.
post #2010 of 9842
Quote:
Originally Posted by dopey View Post
I did not find that Ed or Connie made reading SF difficult or unpleasant. That has nothing to do with whether they should be on leave for some offense or another, but if people are keeping track of who thinks their absence has made SF a better place, don't count me.

Or me. In fact, I found the first 3-4 days relatively boring (then again, I spend all my time in the bottom half of the forum). Now since the Spitzer/Catholic stuff has picked up, it's interesting, but I do not think SF is bette rwithout them.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Transparent Moderation Log & Site Topics - Part I