If your wardrobe is too large, you end up looking worse. - Page 11

Please do, this is a very interesting subject that should elicit a lively discussion. General chat may be the best (and least contentious) place for it.

This thread remains interesting. I think it's becoming apparent that the focus of the discussion shouldn't so much be on the size of your wardrobe in terms of pure number, but on its cohesion (or otherwise). While it's not necessarily true, for most of us, cohesion is easier with fewer items than with more.

The exchange between Vox and Mafoofan quoted below is very interesting. In light of my comment above, I feel Vox puts himself in an awkard position when he asserts that lack of variety is the primary problem in fits here whilst agreeing that following your personal inclinations in how you dress is the most important point. My own personal inclinations in how I dress do not involve a great deal of variety, as my WAYWRN posts attest. Mafoofan is a more extreme example of this and I can easily think of more examples of this both inside the forum and in the outside world. Are all these people less well dressed than their counterparts with more variety?

Personally, I feel variety (and scale) is more likely to be a danger than a help. While there are exceptions, the posters I admire the most here are the most consistent ones; because they dress in their own style, not just stylishly.

..

Edited by merkur - 7/29/11 at 5:38am

Agreed.

Even though our wardrobes are of a different size ... it seems we share some common feelings about them.
I could say the same about my wardrobe.
From what I've heard said, my wardrobe is a rather extensive by Style Forum standards (but it isn't by my friends' standards) and it too can be made to look interesting and different all the time.
My suits and shoes range in age from 30+ years to quite recent ... and I, as you, feel I don't need any more.

About your wardrobe, you say...
Mine is likely closer to the latter ... although I would not say I'm actually there.
I had a clue as to where I fit in ... but thought it worth asking anyway.

I'm not at all uncomfortable with what I have. Like you more would make me uncomfortable ... and I too could easily manage with less. I know this for a fact as I now purchase far less than I discard ... so I'm certainly moving in the direction of less. Where will I end up in terms of quantity? I haven't a clue. That will take scrutiny over time.

I think so, especially if it is not built over a very long time period.

I think a lot of ideas put forth in this thread boil down to one thing: the need for 'authenticity' - to be a man who wears his clothes, not vice versa. But no one has actually explained why this should be an ideal in the first place. Then again, it could just be a load of bull: a massive, messy attempt at justification/intellectualisation of wardrobe choices/size coupled with a desperate (unrealised) need to have these choices be acknowledged by others as the 'right' ones.

The authenticity-ownership thing is important, but I think WAYWN also suffers from epidemically poor technical execution. Patterns, colors, textures, etc., just don't go together. You can 'own' a look and still look terrible (Lapo Elkann gomes to mind).

In that light, I maintain that accumulating too quickly and too fervently tends to reduce output quality. I get the sense that a lot of people buy ties and pocket squares just to get a fix. The result? Lots of ugly, mismatched ties and pocket squares.

I would contend that the general zeitgeist of SF - where with few exceptions*, experimentation is apparently prized over conventionalism/repetition - has a lot to do with the content on WAYWRN. I very much doubt that all the more outre posters on WAYWRN wear what they appear to do, day in day out. In that sense, it's a form of escapism. *: when your wardrobe is bespoke/expensive and tailored in a 'romantic' country that evokes an inexpl;cable sense of sentimentalism; when you are a member with enough posts or an enviable lifestyle to warrant 'default' goodwill; etc...

And the fix is ever so fleeting.

I've never seriously considered this possibility. It's hard for me to fathom people getting dressed up just to take grainy, headless photos for an internet forum--but then, people do many stranger things.

However, I suspect that escapism does come into play, just less explicitly. My guess is that the vast majority of people who post in WAYWRN actually wear their outifts outside of the house, but their preferences are crafted more by fantasy and aspirations to costume than by an interest in dressing well. It's like Dungeons & Dragons for vain grown-ups.


With a long, bitter after taste.

And ... it's much worse when it's a suit. I have several that are now throw pillows.

This thread is eliciting so many thoughtful replies that I can't get to all the ones that merit comment.

So let me just start with Mattypoo's excellent point.

I think that it would be impossible to disagree fundamentally with this goal, the goal of "owning" a way of dressing. It sounds nice. Sartorial terroir.

But we live in a rather swirly world today, do we not? Whether the rush of the waters is a circling of the drain or the adventure of the high seas, who can say?

Chinese men wear Italian slip-ons and photograph themselves with Germen lenses drinking French wines. Americans dress like lethargic and picky Neapolitan aristocrats. Californian men are in skirts. High JASPS of the UWS trod about in Japanese denim. Descendants of the Mayflower and the cannibal feasts of the South Seas get English tailors to make Fabergé eggs out of simple buttonholes. Topsy turvy. Glorious?

Inglorious?

It is simply the way things have become.

And then when you jump out of the plane from this high altitude view and parachute deep into the clothing Interwebz and things like WAYRN threads, you also have the following going on: quests for information, change and self improvement; validation and conformity on the fly; vanity.

Unless one equates "ownership" of dress with manifest, demonstrable uniformity of dress, I think that it would hard to go much further than that in such an environment to determine who owns what look...particular among a bunch of strangers.

Chew on that.

- B

For me, it comes down to an issue of space and favorites. I don't keep anything not worn in a season. For spending (since I refuse to buy on credit), I have set numbered limits on any given item. 25 shirts, 10 suits, 10 pairs of shoes, 5 odd coats & trousers. I have a box where I store ties and once it overflows I start giving stuff away.