or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc... - Page 4621  

post #69301 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by smfdoc View Post
 

I am considering getting a Bellevue chukka boot built on the 511 last as the Malone and Wilbert on that last worked for me. I would love to hear from someone who can say if the size on this boot runs the same as the 511 last shoes. I thought I would ask as the 201 last Freiberg did not work well for me even though I have shoes on the same last. Thanks as always.

 

I have 2 pairs of Bellevues, the brown and a MTO pair in natural cxl w no perforations.  The 511 last fits me great in 98% of shoes, boots and chukkas I have tried.  Have 3 pairs of Wilberts, natty cxl, outland and brown cxl.


Sad to see the Malone following recent trend, offered up to size 14 on the 511 last.  Everything on the 511 last used to be offered in a 15.  (with an upcharge, they will make the 15)

 

MTO Bellevue:

post #69302 of 70737
Wearing my brown promontory point boots
post #69303 of 70737

Walnut Rogues, but I have used Chili polish to give a little deeper color and to remove some of the "orange" of walnut.

 

post #69304 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by jzrhwinnj View Post
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by smfdoc View Post
 

I am considering getting a Bellevue chukka boot built on the 511 last as the Malone and Wilbert on that last worked for me. I would love to hear from someone who can say if the size on this boot runs the same as the 511 last shoes. I thought I would ask as the 201 last Freiberg did not work well for me even though I have shoes on the same last. Thanks as always.

 

I have 2 pairs of Bellevues, the brown and a MTO pair in natural cxl w no perforations.  The 511 last fits me great in 98% of shoes, boots and chukkas I have tried.  Have 3 pairs of Wilberts, natty cxl, outland and brown cxl.


Sad to see the Malone following recent trend, offered up to size 14 on the 511 last.  Everything on the 511 last used to be offered in a 15.  (with an upcharge, they will make the 15)

 

MTO Bellevue:

Thanks for the information. I will see how they fit when they arrive.

post #69305 of 70737

I just picked up some suede McNeils and a hat tip to Peppercorn for suggesting Tarrago Nano to protect the suede. I had never heard of the product and thought I would share for those who have the same concerns.

 

 

post #69306 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarlet View Post

I'm not a fan on longwings in general, but the Leiden almost makes me mad. The Larchmont and Boca Raton totally don't fit my style, but I still found them sleek and well balanced on their own, and would appreciate them if I saw them on someone else's feet. The wings on the Leiden being so low and flat just makes it look bloated and dumpy to me.

Why this and still not the Player 2? > : (


Here are some snaps of me wearing the Larchmonts. I'm gonna miss the 333 last, if it is truly going away.  It's probably my best fitting AE last.

 

npLdIOT.jpg GLCwnBn.jpg

post #69307 of 70737

2014 MTO black cxl Long Branches w/ medallion only perforations,

& Gigi @ 6.5 months.

 

post #69308 of 70737

Hi Guys - I'm hoping one of you sizing gurus can help me.  I'm looking to purchase a pair of McTavish, but have heard that the rough collection sizing is a little (or a lot) strange.  Currently, I have the MacNeil in 11.5C, the Leeds in 12B and the Ashton in 11.5B and all fit me well.  My brannock size is a 12B.  Any ideas on what size McTavish I should go with?  Thanks in advance for any help you can lend.

post #69309 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by jzrhwinnj View Post
 

2014 MTO black cxl Long Branches w/ medallion only perforations,

& Gigi @ 6.5 months.

 

 

pooch is getting big...You need to post the first pic of the dog along with all new pics

post #69310 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snobol323 View Post
 

Hi Guys - I'm hoping one of you sizing gurus can help me.  I'm looking to purchase a pair of McTavish, but have heard that the rough collection sizing is a little (or a lot) strange.  Currently, I have the MacNeil in 11.5C, the Leeds in 12B and the Ashton in 11.5B and all fit me well.  My brannock size is a 12B.  Any ideas on what size McTavish I should go with?  Thanks in advance for any help you can lend.

I brannock a 13E and just sized down o a 12eee....I had a 13D and they were a touch long yet not wide enough for narrow v-gap closure as I have a high arch..I also am a 13E in the 511 last and a 12eee in 65 lasted bals and 12e in 65 lasted blutcher

post #69311 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snobol323 View Post
 

Hi Guys - I'm hoping one of you sizing gurus can help me.  I'm looking to purchase a pair of McTavish, but have heard that the rough collection sizing is a little (or a lot) strange.  Currently, I have the MacNeil in 11.5C, the Leeds in 12B and the Ashton in 11.5B and all fit me well.  My brannock size is a 12B.  Any ideas on what size McTavish I should go with?  Thanks in advance for any help you can lend.

 

I wear a 9d in the 97 last (of which the MacNeil is) and a 8E for the McTavish.

post #69312 of 70737

Thanks for the quick responses, guys.  I appreciate it!

post #69313 of 70737

Chilli Bleecker St. today..

 

They are amazingly comfortable and sleek , AE should bring them back at least for MTO (in exotic shell..wishful thinking I know...)

 

post #69314 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7_rocket View Post

Is it true that the Mcgregor fit large compared to the other 65 lasted shoe? i always thought it was a great looking shoe
Not sure if this was answered but yes, mine fit larger, maybe a 1/4 size?. Not enough to size up, but noticeable. I have them in Walnut, love them! J
post #69315 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7_rocket View Post

Is it true that the Mcgregor fit large compared to the other 65 lasted shoe? i always thought it was a great looking shoe

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pudman43 View Post


Not sure if this was answered but yes, mine fit larger, maybe a 1/4 size?. Not enough to size up, but noticeable. I have them in Walnut, love them! J


Wore mine out for the first time today. They haven't fully broken in yet, but the difference doesn't seem to be on the footbed as far as I can tell. It definitely doesn't feel any bigger than the Lexington, so I'm guessing that the blucher aspect is going to put less pressure on the balls and the instep. With less pressure on the instep pushing the foot back, the heel probably seems to be less constricted as well. This is at least the way it seems in my particular case. 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...