or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc... - Page 4113  

post #61681 of 70737

I purchased a pair of walnut strands recently. It's my first pair of Allen Edmonds so I went to the store to be fitted. We tried at least 6 pairs of shoes and we ended up going with the 9.5 C. It felt a bit tight but the 9.5 D had too much "air" on the top front of my feet so he said it's definitely not a 9.5 D. We tried some 10's and I had a slight heel slip. However, the 9.5 C felt really tight, especially when I walk. I can feel my smaller toes touching the inside of the shoe wall if that makes any sense. It bothered me enough to go back and get a second opinion. I met with a different employee there and told her that I thought the shoes were too small and wanted her to measure me again. She checked the fit first and said that they seemed to actually be perfect but she would take a look anyways. She had me try the 9.5 D again and told me the same thing, that it has too much air and that wasn't good. She said that it would take a while for the shoes to break in and that if I really wanted to she could stretch them for me.

 

I've always heard that these shoes don't need to be broken in so hearing that and especially the comment about stretching them really got me worried. Do I just have a really odd size (between C and D)? I haven't worn them outside yet so I think I can still either return them or sell them but they make it sound like you need to really wear them in before you can see how comfortable they will be. But by that point if I did get the wrong size, it would be too late to exchange.  

post #61682 of 70737

how about a 9 EE or EEE or something?

 

I wonder how you would fare with that

post #61683 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by acct View Post

Guys I just bought brand new AE Park Aves (firsts) from the AE store. I have attached pics of some some minor blemishes/imperfections. Am I being too picky if I ask for a replacement? Considering these are firsts I was expecting them to be flawless....




Bolded statement above is the problem. These will not be flawless shoes. Just "in spec." If you need perfection, look more towards Edward Green or G and G.

That notch in the heel is a feature, not a flaw. It's so you don't accidentally catch your pant cuff on the heel.

The second picture is a little more bothersome. That looks like a little knock in the leather. How big and how deep is it? It still looks black to me, so that leads me to believe it's very shallow. You could theoretically polish over, or fill with sealing compound and then polish. But if it's deep, then you must return. I advocate high tolerance for AE shoes, especially at deep discount, but a cut in the upper is not acceptable.
post #61684 of 70737

I wear a 10D. But my feet are pretty narrow so I'm like in between a C and D. When you put them on and walk they should be comfortable. I don't understand all this breaking in business. The only thing that should break in is the cork under sole that conforms to your feet! But  sometimes no matter how much you love the shoe, the last doesn't work for some people's feet. :/

post #61685 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by acct View Post

Guys I just bought brand new AE Park Aves (firsts) from the AE store. I have attached pics of some some minor blemishes/imperfections. Am I being too picky if I ask for a replacement? Considering these are firsts I was expecting them to be flawless....




I don't see a problem in the 1st photo. If you are referring to the cut on inside corner of the heel, that's how they are supposed to be, so that you don't keep catching your pants.

In the 2nd photo all that I see is "v" like mark on the leather. As long as it's it's not a cut or a scratch, I wouldn't worry about it.
post #61686 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Iron View Post

 

Wow.  Those shoes are beauties!

post #61687 of 70737
I received the Patriot loafers in Merlot calf from the shoebank. I was really looking forward to these shoes, but what a disappointment!

1) it took a fair amount of effort by pulling, stretching and bending to get my feet in, and they were not all that small once in. However, I was experiencing significant pressure on the instep.

2) what's up with the soles sticking out 1/4 inch on every side. They put my reverse welt double oak soles to shame.

I can't believe these shoes are so popular among SF members. Or did I get a really defective pair?
post #61688 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by mreams99 View Post

I hate to ask this. My local store doesn't carry much in my size, so I can never try things on.
The 65 last in 13B fits good. The 511 is OK, but slightly short. The Clark Street (108 last) fits good in a 13B.
I'd like to try the 222 last. How does this compare to the 108 or 65?

Your fit descriptions sound just like mine (although I'm a 13D). I'd suggest upping a width in the 222, although I only have one pair of shoes on this last. I took a 13E (in the Chili Grain Eagle County MTO) and they fit ok. I'd say the 511 is a bit better than the 222, at least for my high instep.

I should add that I'm almost on the edge of 13D/E but prefer 13D because of my narrow heels. I figure the vamp can always stretch, the heel won't always stop slipping.
post #61689 of 70737

Did the ol' NYC Burlington trawl after the gym this afternoon. If you're in or near Brooklyn, pop into the awfulness that is the Atlantic Center mall (Okay...stop at the pretzel place on the ground floor and get the cheddar stuffed pretzels. I'm not allowed to have 'em, so i'll live vicariously through you) and go to the third floor to that Burlington Coat factory and go to the back where you'll find these...

 

A GORGEOUS pair of burnished Bleecker Streets in 10D, Walnut Fairmont loafers in 11D, and a pair of Snuff Suede Gobis in an 11D as well...

 

Side views and prices on each below...

 

V-Tap Soled Bleecker Streets (Note the “Seconds” shoe brand on the sole. The glitch seems to be the angle of the cuff-saver cut on the right shoe. Eminently forgivable.)

 

 

 

 

 

Fairmonts... (These are “Seconds” too, from the subtle shoe brand on the “Othello rubber sole. Still Goodyear welted and eligible for full recrafting—and there were two pairs in 11D)

 

 

 

Gobis (Missing a lace and the “Seconds” mark, but in pretty good shape—there was also a pair in 10D)

 

 

 

 

BUT THESE...may have been the winners I spotted. Navy Suede McGregors in 11D. Goddamn but I scoured the joint for a pair in 12 for myself, but alas...no dice. Somebody PLEASE get these! Have a friend go down and get 'em for ya... I know, they're “Seconds” probably due to that little bit of stitch drift on the right shoe's sole, but Mercy! These looked beautiful in person!

 

 

 

Closing with the usual...“GO GIT 'EM BOYS...” :)

post #61690 of 70737

Hey guys,

 

A bit of an OCD question here. I am apparently between a C and a D according to the size guide online/Brannock device, but the stores here that carry AE (ie. not actual AE stores) don't have C's I can try. I bought a pair of Strands in 9D last month. They feel nice by around mid-day when I tie up the laces tightly. A bit roomy in the morning, though.

 

I'm actually about to buy a pair of PA on Nordstrom for their sale and was not sure if I should get a C or a D. I've seen a pretty wide range of lace gaps (ie. super wide to almost nil), and was wondering what constitutes as an ideal lace gap? I took a picture of what mine look like just now (don't mind the pants haha it was just what I was wearing at the time) and was wondering if it's not too narrow. If the gap is too narrow, I'll go with the C, but if you guys think it's ok, I'll just play it safe and go with the D. It's a lot of money to drop so I want to make sure I get the best fit possible :)

 

Thanks!

post #61691 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by vector View Post
 

Hey guys,

 

A bit of an OCD question here. I am apparently between a C and a D according to the size guide online/Brannock device, but the stores here that carry AE (ie. not actual AE stores) don't have C's I can try. I bought a pair of Strands in 9D last month. They feel nice by around mid-day when I tie up the laces tightly. A bit roomy in the morning, though.

 

I'm actually about to buy a pair of PA on Nordstrom for their sale and was not sure if I should get a C or a D. I've seen a pretty wide range of lace gaps (ie. super wide to almost nil), and was wondering what constitutes as an ideal lace gap? I took a picture of what mine look like just now (don't mind the pants haha it was just what I was wearing at the time) and was wondering if it's not too narrow. If the gap is too narrow, I'll go with the C, but if you guys think it's ok, I'll just play it safe and go with the D. It's a lot of money to drop so I want to make sure I get the best fit possible :)

 

Thanks!

"Ideal" for a closed-lace, broken-in shoe, to me, would be exactly closed and fitting like a glove. The gap on yours looks fine. I'd be wary of going narrower. But in my world at least, pretty much zero people will ever notice (AE SAs, maybe...and even then, probably not).

post #61692 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterellington View Post

Did the ol' NYC Burlington trawl after the gym this afternoon. If you're in or near Brooklyn, pop into the awfulness that is the Atlantic Center mall (Okay...stop at the pretzel place on the ground floor and get the cheddar stuffed pretzels. I'm not allowed to have 'em, so i'll live vicariously through you) and go to the third floor to that Burlington Coat factory and go to the back where you'll find these...








wow, some awesome finds! May be worth the trip from Jersey...
post #61693 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardHarrow View Post

I wear a 10D. But my feet are pretty narrow so I'm like in between a C and D. When you put them on and walk they should be comfortable. I don't understand all this breaking in business. The only thing that should break in is the cork under sole that conforms to your feet! But  sometimes no matter how much you love the shoe, the last doesn't work for some people's feet. :/

When I tried on the D it felt like it would crease bad because of how much space I had on the top front of my feet. Length wise they were fine, I couldn't go any smaller.

I just don't know if I'm being too picky comparing my new shoes with my current broken in shoes. I feel like whenever I go to the only AE store around, they are just going to tell me the same thing, that it's the right size.

I currently have 9.5D Florsheim which feel great but I do think they are a bit wide as I have plenty of room inside. I know it's a competent different shoe but I don't have much to compare with.
post #61694 of 70737
@HealthActuary: A 9 would be even worse than the 8. The 8 is borderline OK on the left in length but it's already not ideal especially since I have a special toe problem there that I don't like talking about. I.e. they are sensitive to the shoe rolling over the wrong part of the foot there due to being too long. Especially when walking down stairs.

I guess I'll have to order MTO a size down on the left next time. But that exacerbates the problem with width fitting and lasts more. Can't just send lots of stock ones I try for the lasts back and then order MTO wink.gif
post #61695 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSO1 View Post

Interesting how the MacNeil 2.0 pattern, since it's "lifted" on the shoe, makes it look more like the Alden LWB. Very nice change, IMO.

What do they mean when they say they 'lifted' the upper?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...