or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc... - Page 223  

post #3331 of 70737
Larchmont is definitely the most intriguing of the 333 shoes, IMHO. Gorgeous, especially in the dark brown.
post #3332 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by elbastardocalvo View Post

Larchmont is definitely the most intriguing of the 333 shoes, IMHO. Gorgeous, especially in the dark brown.

Even more intriguing than the return of the mora in 333 last?
post #3333 of 70737
Yes. I don't care for monks.
post #3334 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by JubeiSpiegel View Post

Some real life pics of the Larchmont, it's a good looking longwing icon_gu_b_slayer[1].gif

239

158

157

I have yet to try on the 333 last, they had little inventory of any of the shoes in this last. Hopefully the AE stores start to get more stock in soon plain.gif

Thank you for posting the photos. Can you imagine the Larchmont in scotchgrain with a double sole?
post #3335 of 70737
I wear a 11.5D in last #5 (Strand, McAllister, etc). Just had to size up to a 12D in the MacNeil's. The toebox was just too narrow. Anyone else or am I nuts?
post #3336 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by bl@ster View Post

I wear a 11.5D in last #5 (Strand, McAllister, etc). Just had to size up to a 12D in the MacNeil's. The toebox was just too narrow. Anyone else or am I nuts?

No, you're not nuts. I had to size up 1/2 in the MacNeil, and someone else here (maybe patrickb) also had to. I found it too short in my true size. I thought I was the only one; good to know it's not just me.
post #3337 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by bl@ster View Post

I wear a 11.5D in last #5 (Strand, McAllister, etc). Just had to size up to a 12D in the MacNeil's. The toebox was just too narrow. Anyone else or am I nuts?


You're not nuts at all.  I wear a 9.5E in the #5, and wear a 10D in Malvern (#1).  The MacNeils have an even more narrow toe box than the Malvern.

post #3338 of 70737

Am I the only one that wishes the Larchmont had closed lacing?

post #3339 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al in Philly View Post

Am I the only one that wishes the Larchmont had closed lacing?

Can you submit a Photoshoped version of that?
post #3340 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Man Of Lint View Post


Thank you for posting the photos. Can you imagine the Larchmont in scotchgrain with a double sole?

 

 = a skinny MacNeil?
 

 

post #3341 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by JubeiSpiegel View Post


Can you submit a Photoshoped version of that?


If only.  I know nothing about photoshop.  I just think think the lines of the shoe don't lend itself well to the open lacing it has.

post #3342 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al in Philly View Post



If only.  I know nothing about photoshop.  I just think think the lines of the shoe don't lend itself well to the open lacing it has.

Hm.. That might be why I can't quite warm up to it, either.
post #3343 of 70737

Also, can anyone speak to the sizing of the Larchmont?  It looks pretty narrow and long, and based on that I think it would be comparable to the fit of the 5 last.

post #3344 of 70737

I'm a total newb (see my handle) but I don't know if I've seen a long wing bal.  Is there a good example?

post #3345 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by sartorialnoob View Post

I'm a total newb (see my handle) but I don't know if I've seen a long wing bal.  Is there a good example?



Yeah, I don't know of any off hand.  I just want the shoe to be their Jefferson model in that last (333), color (chocolate) and price point.  The Jefferson is overpriced IMO.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...