or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc... - Page 752  

post #11266 of 70737
What do you mean by "flat"?
post #11267 of 70737
As in black is a flat color?
post #11268 of 70737

Really, the color on the website is so much darker, talking about the walnut color.

post #11269 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap10046 View Post

As in black is a flat color?

To be fair, the dark brown is not at all black in person. That, and black is technically not a color... smile.gif
post #11270 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenfoldtieguy View Post

I'm nowhere near a size 14, but I will say the Malvern is one of the most miserably fitting shoes/boots I have ever tried on. It fit totally different than other AE models on the same last????

I wear 14/15 depending on the shoe. After a dozen years of wearing AE, my philosophy is to try on every shoe and try to try on 3 sizes to make sure that I am getting the best fit. Even then, some lasts and models just don't work.

Also, the only AE that I have found to give at all with "break in" are the shell MacNeil I bought this year. Others might have softened but not loosened.
post #11271 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap10046 View Post

As in black is a flat color?

Reread your previous post and now I understand.
post #11272 of 70737

I am a long time AE fan.  I also own some Aldens and various Italian brands so I am no way a brand loyalist nor a total snob.  I just buy stuff of good quality that I like.   That being said, there are two areas where I think AE is really fallling short, curious if you agree. 

 

1) Lack of suede offerings.  It used to be that AE offered quite a few of their mainstay dress shoes in suede as a standard offering.  I just searched on suede today and the only thing that came up were the Players in limited sizes (because they are being discontinued) and some items from the rough collection.  I am wearing my vintage 2007 Seude Delrays as I type and they look as good as the day I bought them.  They don't crease and with minimal care hold up better than calfskin, in my opinion.  You can order them as a custom, but for a $100 mark up.  Seems ridiculous.   And the fact that they are cancelling the players after such a short run is kind of annoying; everyone raves about them and they are a great, fashion-forward but classic shoe. 

 

2) The "painted" black welting and edge trim, particularly on their shell offerings.  For example, on the burgandy Leeds, the edgetrim and welting are painted black.   It makes a $600 shoe look like a $50 throw away. A natural edge trim or dark brown, to me, looks much more refined.  They are doing this on the black McTavish, which I own and is a really good look.  I just wish AE paid more attention to this aspect of their shoes.  I think this is where they fall short next to Alden.  Look at the profiles of an alden, and you can see each layer of the sole, you can see where the welting meets the outsole, how the heel is stacked up.  Look at a profile of AE, and for the most part you see a paint job covering up all the details of a welted shoe.  I don't think this is a cost issue as much as a design, or lack of design, issue. 

post #11273 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by stingthisgordon View Post

I am a long time AE fan.  I also own some Aldens and various Italian brands so I am no way a brand loyalist nor a total snob.  I just buy stuff of good quality that I like.   That being said, there are two areas where I think AE is really fallling short, curious if you agree. 

 

1) Lack of suede offerings.  It used to be that AE offered quite a few of their mainstay dress shoes in suede as a standard offering.  I just searched on suede today and the only thing that came up were the Players in limited sizes (because they are being discontinued) and some items from the rough collection.  I am wearing my vintage 2007 Seude Delrays as I type and they look as good as the day I bought them.  They don't crease and with minimal care hold up better than calfskin, in my opinion.  You can order them as a custom, but for a $100 mark up.  Seems ridiculous.   And the fact that they are cancelling the players after such a short run is kind of annoying; everyone raves about them and they are a great, fashion-forward but classic shoe. 

 

2) The "painted" black welting and edge trim, particularly on their shell offerings.  For example, on the burgandy Leeds, the edgetrim and welting are painted black.   It makes a $600 shoe look like a $50 throw away. A natural edge trim or dark brown, to me, looks much more refined.  They are doing this on the black McTavish, which I own and is a really good look.  I just wish AE paid more attention to this aspect of their shoes.  I think this is where they fall short next to Alden.  Look at the profiles of an alden, and you can see each layer of the sole, you can see where the welting meets the outsole, how the heel is stacked up.  Look at a profile of AE, and for the most part you see a paint job covering up all the details of a welted shoe.  I don't think this is a cost issue as much as a design, or lack of design, issue. 

 

I don't know if it is any consolation, but here are some special make-ups from Allen Edmonds for other companies.

 

Grayson in Snuff or Black Suede:

http://www.landsend.com/pp/mens-allen-edmonds-grayson-slip-on-moc-toe-tassel-shoes~244221_-1.html

 

McNeil in Snuff Suede

http://shop.freemanssportingclub.com/products/ae-x-fsc-mcneil

 

Mora in Wheat Suede

http://shop.ballandbuck.com/products/allen-edmonds-x-ball-and-buck-double-monk-strap-wheat-suede

post #11274 of 70737

They definitely are a good bit more expensive to do the Allen Edmonds Custom shoes though.

post #11275 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenfoldtieguy View Post

I'm nowhere near a size 14, but I will say the Malvern is one of the most miserably fitting shoes/boots I have ever tried on. It fit totally different than other AE models on the same last????

This has been my experience. I'm an 11.5 D on the 5 last, and I think most say you should be the same size on the 1 last. Both 11.5 D and 12 D Malverns were too tight in the toe box for me, and I gave up after that.
post #11276 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa Doble View Post

This has been my experience. I'm an 11.5 D on the 5 last, and I think most say you should be the same size on the 1 last. Both 11.5 D and 12 D Malverns were too tight in the toe box for me, and I gave up after that.

I wear 9D on the 5 last. A 9.5D in the Malvern was too tight for me. A 9D in the Malvern was unwearable.
post #11277 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa Doble View Post


This has been my experience. I'm an 11.5 D on the 5 last, and I think most say you should be the same size on the 1 last. Both 11.5 D and 12 D Malverns were too tight in the toe box for me, and I gave up after that.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenfoldtieguy View Post


I wear 9D on the 5 last. A 9.5D in the Malvern was too tight for me. A 9D in the Malvern was unwearable.

 

Maybe this is a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway since I like the idea of getting some chukka's at some point...  Why didn't you just graduate up to the next size until you found one that was comfortable?  Did sizing up make them fit poorly in other areas such that there was no combination that worked?

post #11278 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyWellSpent View Post


Maybe this is a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway since I like the idea of getting some chukka's at some point...  Why didn't you just graduate up to the next size until you found one that was comfortable?  Did sizing up make them fit poorly in other areas such that there was no combination that worked?

I wear an 11D in Strands/Park Aves and tried 11D and 11.5D in the Bayfields. The 11D was way too narrow and the 11.5D was too long. I also tried an 11D in the Malverns and they were too narrow. I'm waiting to receive an 11E in the Malverns and am hoping they fit well.
post #11279 of 70737
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenfoldtieguy View Post

I'm nowhere near a size 14, but I will say the Malvern is one of the most miserably fitting shoes/boots I have ever tried on. It fit totally different than other AE models on the same last????

 

I talked to the AE CS about the Malvern when I ordered the Dundee's because I had the same experience. She said they used memory foam in the Malvern and that is why they fit totally different than the others on the same last. 

post #11280 of 70737

Does anyone have both the Bayfields and the Daltons? Was curious how the fit is between the two. I assume they fit very similarly, but figured I'd ask. 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...