Quote:
Originally Posted by
MrG 
Do you really think these women thought "this guy, and guys like him, have been repressing us for far too long, and we must show that we'll no longer accept the oppression created by the patriarchal nature of our society"? I'm betting no. More likely they were angry and hurt and just sociopathic enough to think their behavior was somehow justified by his infidelity. They committed a sex crime, and they should pay the price just as any man who did something similar.
These specific women? Probably not. At least not consciously. Your analysis could be spot on.
Quote:
It's bizarre to me that our society can condemn things like female circumcision (and rightfully so), yet when a man experiences something similar we're treated to an attempt at portraying what they've done as some defense of women's rights.
I think the reactions by some people to the OP bear some of my original observations out - not necessarily the motivation of the attackers, but the greater observation. If the responses in this thread (save yours and I think a couple of others) were an indication of men in society, they imply that perhaps the only way to get some men to keep it in their pants is to get violent, because they respond well to that. It's a weird reinforcement, and I think to a degree is the concern JD expressed.
On the other hand - perhaps the posters who reacted with "man, don't cheat" just post that because they feel the need to respond positively to violence, because real men settle things with violence. That's not surprising to me - gender stereotypes and roles can screw with men too.
I re-read my original comment and can see how it reads like I'm defending the actions of the women. I'm not. I'm just commenting on a state of affairs where women (consciously or not) think violence is the way to get their point across, and men seem to apparently, to a degree, agree. The way my mind works - I want to understand WHY that is, 'cause I think that's how it gets addressed. YMMV.