or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Random fashion thoughts
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Random fashion thoughts - Page 5921

post #88801 of 100272
Utopia from last year had top notch cinematography, great use of colors and music, plus a bit of the old ultraviolence. Check it out!
post #88802 of 100272

Obvious answer, but Breaking Bad has some amazing cinematography throughout the series.

post #88803 of 100272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dill View Post

Utopia from last year had top notch cinematography, great use of colors and music, plus a bit of the old ultraviolence. Check it out!

holy sht, just finished the first episode, a lot of work went into all the shots during production and in post edits. great story telling too icon_gu_b_slayer[1].gificon_gu_b_slayer[1].gif thanks for the recommendation !
post #88804 of 100272

It boggles my mind when a B&M store won't return emails or voicemail regarding finding the right size to purchase on a $300+ item. If the business is a side hobby, and they don't really care about making sales I wish they would just disclose that on their webstores. 

post #88805 of 100272
i just got this message in PM :

Please Give Pastor Paul this Code XQ94 and your names to send you what I left for your attempt to assist me before which failed us somehow,thank God I survived after so many years in Ivory coast. His name is Pastor Paul Roma and his address is pastorpaulroma225 - at - priest - com, Hope you remember me Asril,

what the fck, i just finished two episodes of utopia so i'm legitimately scared... no one's after me right?
post #88806 of 100272

that message must have taken a considerable amount of drugs to produce

 

i'm quite impressed

post #88807 of 100272
Sherlock is so good
Misfits too (especially first 3 seasons, but the last 2 are enjoyable too)
Started watching Utopia a while ago, but just couldn't muster the will to continue after 3-4 episodes, shit's heavy (amazinly well done though and will probably start watching again)
Shameless (us version) is really good if you give it a few episodes

And for more "simple" entertainment, Castle will always be a favorite of mine biggrin.gif
post #88808 of 100272
post #88809 of 100272
Quote:
Originally Posted by kindofyoung View Post

Misfits too (especially only first 3 seasons, but the last 2 are enjoyable too)
post #88810 of 100272
My GF described Top of the Lake as Twin Peaks if you take all of the interesting stuff out.

Also, someone please buy this:



http://www.yoox.com/us/43179120FQ/item?dept=men&tp=47830&utm_source=criteo_us&utm_medium=shopping&utm_campaign=yoox_us&utm_content=abandoned_carts#cod10=43179120FQ&sizeId=6
post #88811 of 100272
Quote:
Originally Posted by reedobandito View Post

If anyone is looking for a good new TV drama, they should check out the French series Les Revenants (The Returned), very similar feel to Twin Peaks or Top of the Lake (which I'll be watching next)

 

Will second this. We recently just cranked through the first season. The music is possibly my favorite part but the acting and cinematography are really great as well. I speak some french but my wife is still learning. It's a pretty good show to watch if you want to learn a bit as a lot of the dialogue is surprisingly simple given the overall concepts the show is addressing. By which, i just mean it's capable of being understood by someone who only had high school-level french.

post #88812 of 100272
been watching 'death in paradise' which is awesome. also 'hannibal' is the best network tv show in years.
post #88813 of 100272

read this when they first posted it. the "hidden professionalism" info is interesting, but the author's overall argument is really, really sloppy. it really needed more reporting and a good editor. here's my (super-long) reasoning, for anyone who's really bored and wants to read it.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
the first part of the argument just assumes that people reselling the clothing rather than giving it away is bad. but that's just an assumption. first off, if the people reselling the clothes weren't making money off it, would the clothing even be able to get to the markets that want it? if it were strictly charity rather than a for-profit business, it might not be worth anyone's time to move it. the receiving market might get a LOT less clothing as a result. it also suggests there's something predatory about it, but that's an assumption too that the author unfortunately doesn't elaborate on. aren't people on the receiving end still getting clothing at vastly reduced costs? or are they not? the author doesn't say, which is a big gap in the reporting. if they are, that's still good, no?

let's say it's good for people individually because they get cheap clothes but it's bad for the receiving market generally because it hurts the local textile industry--basically the author's next point. that issue is a separate matter though that has to be dealt with by the local market. here's why: the author says the second-hand market keeps people from buying locally made products, but she doesn't actually explain why. presumably it's because the second-hand goods are cheaper, and maybe even more in-demand if they're Western products (like maybe it's cooler to wear a second-hand tshirt with a Chicago Bulls logo than a locally made tshirt). but the blame there isn't on the donor market; it's on the receiving market. they're choosing to buy the cheap second-hand clothes rather than supporting their local industry. it's the same issue you see when a big chain store moves into a place and pushes out the local businesses. if people are buying the second-hand clothes because they're cheap, then you could see the same problem if an H&M moved in and sold brand new clothing. it would still be undermining the local textile industry if people choose to shop there rather than at a local, independent store. in other words, stopping the flood of cheap second-hand clothes doesn't necessarily solve the problem. to do that, the local market would have to make sure that NO company selling cheap abundant clothing was allowed in. that's the only way to protect the local industry. only the local market can do that, so the blame isn't necessarily on the donor market. and going back to the first argument--that reselling the clothes rather than donating it is problematic--just donating the clothes wouldn't solve this issue either. in fact, no local retailer or textile maker or whatever would be able to compete with free clothes.

the author then goes on to explain why fast fashion and consumerism hurt the donor markets, too. but that argument is sloppy as well. she basically says if the donor market weren't shipping all their cast off clothing, it would just pile up in the donor markets and we would suddenly be aware what a problem fast fashion is. but that's another big assumption. more likely all the tossed out clothing would still be out of sight in a landfill somewhere and people would keep buying disposable clothing.

basically every point is full of holes that are never filled in. that's not to say the author is necessarily wrong, just that the piece needed a lot more reporting and a good editor to ask these questions and focus the piece.
post #88814 of 100272

This is actually an old story, just rehashed.  A lot of good studies on this phenomenon have been conducted, and the conclusions are always the same.

 

The problem can really be summed up thus:

1) Price is always the main driver, and the more impoverished a society, the more price is a driver (put it this way - we can choose to buy "Made in America" goods that are a lot more expensive than whatever Made in Vietnam/Bangladesh goods are available at Walmart or Old Navy.  This is a trivial example of what faces the truly impoverished.).  Cheap secondhand goods make local manufacturing, which is usually step one is building an economy, non-competitive..  Because second hand clothining is so cheap, resellers will always be able to undercut any meaningful local manufacturing.

2) The problem starts from the production of the disposable clothing.  A store like Walmart buys a teeshirt for about $2 from a Bangleshi .  $1.5 of that is material costs.  Everything else, overhead, transportation, labor, is included in the remaining $0.50.  Now, you decrease that cost significantly below material cost in the third world second hard market.  If your competitors can sell for less than it costs you to buy materials, you are never, ever, going to be able to complete.

3) The organizations that sell the second hand clothes have good intentions in mind, and the money that they get from the sale of donated clothing goes to good use, but this is an unintended consequence that may undermine their very efforts.

post #88815 of 100272
Anybody know someplace that is selling the exact sweater linked below besides Mr. Porter? TIA

That snarky little Canuck fucker has inspired me to try it.

http://www.mrporter.com/product/378175
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Random fashion thoughts