Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Apple rejects official Google Voice iPhone app
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple rejects official Google Voice iPhone app

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 
http://gizmodo.com/5324268/apple-rej...ice-iphone-app

Quote:
Now we know why Google Voice apps were only released for BlackBerry and Android. Apple rejected Google's official Google Voice app when it was submitted for approval six weeks ago. What. The. Shit.

Here's the quote from the Google spokesperson to TechCrunch:

"We work hard to bring Google applications to a number of mobile platforms, including the iPhone. Apple did not approve the Google Voice application we submitted six weeks ago to the Apple App Store. We will continue to work to bring our services to iPhone users - for example, by taking advantage of advances in mobile browsers."

This news comes on the heels of Sean Kovacs' GV Mobile Google Voice app being pulled from the store for "duplicating features." Even though, TechCrunch relates, Phil Schiller himself personally approved GV Mobile and called Kovacs to apologize when its initial approval was delayed months ago.

TechCrunch suspects, probably correctly, that apps for Google Voice are being rejected at least in part through AT&T's influence, since Google Voice lets you send free text messages and delivers cut-rate international calls"”on top of making phone numbers even more meaningless"”making it scary to AT&T in way like Skype VoIP over 3G. Either way, it seems obvious the Google Voice service is being targeted for extinction, at least as a native app on the iPhone.

Google plans to take the same route it was forced to take with Latitude on the iPhone"”web app land. It's an interesting switch for Google and Apple on the app front, actually. Google was noted for getting away with using private APIs in its Google Mobile app to make the voice search command work. Now Apple's rejected two of its major apps in a row, in a way validating Google's belief that web apps are the future anyway.

It seems somewhat silly, and a bit of a reach, to insinuate the rejections are signs of brewing hostilities between Apple and Google, but you have to figure if there weren't any behind the rejections, they've at least got to be causing some anxiety by now.

Whatever the reasons, it sucks, and as Jason Kincaid says, what's really troubling about this rejection is that it appears that "Apple is now actively stifling innovation." And the whole black box app approval process doesn't exactly alleviate that sinking feeling either. After all, if Google doesn't stand a chance, how does anybody else?

Microsoft gets a lot of shit about being anticompetitive and/or a monopoly yet viewing the way Apple has been headed in recent times they seem to be more guilty of this.

I have no doubt that AT&T have a huge role in this decision given the potential revenue loss they get from SMS (and perhaps the international calling as well) but I think the decision ultimately lies with Apple.
post #2 of 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbie View Post
http://gizmodo.com/5324268/apple-rej...ice-iphone-app



Microsoft gets a lot of shit about being anticompetitive and/or a monopoly yet viewing the way Apple has been headed in recent times they seem to be more guilty of this.

I have no doubt that AT&T have a huge role in this decision given the potential revenue loss they get from SMS (and perhaps the international calling as well) but I think the decision ultimately lies with Apple.

how is this at all about anticompetition and monopoly. any sane ceo would choose good at&t deal over google voice. customers can obviously complain, but why would any company voluntarily give up revenue.
post #3 of 6
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by indesertum View Post
how is this at all about anticompetition and monopoly. any sane ceo would choose good at&t deal over google voice. customers can obviously complain, but why would any company voluntarily give up revenue.

Why are these apps allowed on other platforms that AT&T also sells e.g. Blackberry?

Is the CEO only half sane?
post #4 of 6
I see your point. Maybe Blackberry can afford to take it.
post #5 of 6
Thread Starter 
From http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/...-google-voice/
Quote:
Apple and AT&T are living dangerously though. Apple has also forced video services like Slingbox to cripple their applications because of purported concerns over data usage, while approving ones from paying partners (e.g. Major League Baseball) that would put more strain on a network than Slingbox’s would. There’s plenty of will in Washington these days to go after the telecoms and impose net neutrality rules. If Apple and AT&T and Google and T-mobile keep this up, don’t be surprised to see the FCC or FTC or your favorite House subcommittee figuring out a way to impose openness rules on mobile app marketplaces, no matter how strenously telecom executives protest that there’s plenty of competition.
post #6 of 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbie View Post
Why are these apps allowed on other platforms that AT&T also sells e.g. Blackberry?

Is the CEO only half sane?

I think a lot of it depends on the contract language between AT&T and the phone makers.

Also, does RIM have centralized control of app sales like Apple does? I've never had a Blackberry.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Apple rejects official Google Voice iPhone app