Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
I got a pair of birkenstock alpros P220 for my boyfriend. At first he thought the were for old ladies and hippies. But since i got them for him, his been wearing them all the time, the reason is...
-
Initial Impressions I ordered Taylor Stitch's 10 oz indigo Cone Mills Flatout shirt (http://taylorstitch.com/products/indigo-cone-flatout). The denim shirts come in three colors: Indigo in 10...
-
Is it somebody who own this and wants to sell?
-
This was a gift from my boss. I kept it for a few months before I just sold it. It is pretty solid. Made in USA. You can't beat the quality. If I needed a sterling silver money clip I would buy a...
-
I just picked this up and I am pretty pleased. Just what I expected. I am pleased with the Bark. However, I wish it was a little darker. A great deal for $35. Comparable to other belts in the...
Styleforum Affiliate Links
- Howard Yount
- Kent Wang
- Malford of London
- Modern Tailor
- Need Supply Co.
- Neighbour
- Oak Street Bootmakers
- Portland Dry Goods
- Roden Gray
- Rick's Kansas City
- Saddleback Leather
- Self Edge
- ShopTheFinest.com
- Shrine
- Tanner Goods/Woodlands Supply
- Tate + Yoko
- Temple of jawnz
- Uncle Otis
- Virtual Clotheshorse
- Wrong Weather
- The Armoury
- A Suitable Wardrobe
- Bespoke England
- Blake
- Blue Owl
- Bodega
- Brigade
- Cedarville Store
- Context Clothing
- Crane's Country Store
- David Reeves Bespoke
- Drinkwater's Cambridge
- eHABERDASHER
- Epaulet
- Equus Leather
- A Fine Pair of Shoes
- Four Horsemen Shop
- Gordon Yao, Hong Kong
- The Hanger Project
- Henry Carter Neckwear
Twitter is finished!
post #2 of 28
7/19/09 at 5:47am
post #4 of 28
7/19/09 at 6:44am
post #6 of 28
7/19/09 at 8:51am
post #7 of 28
7/19/09 at 10:03am
post #8 of 28
7/19/09 at 12:08pm
Twitter isnt going anywhere. I don't mind twitter since it has its uses and is largely avoidable. I also like the 140 char limit, if you want to communicate your banalities en large then start a blog. Pulse of the planet is a nice catch phrase, it makes it sound like its not just a billion people yelling into a chasm about how long the line at Cinnabon is. What I fear is intrusive broadcast technology.
post #9 of 28
7/19/09 at 12:12pm
post #10 of 28
7/19/09 at 12:14pm
post #11 of 28
7/19/09 at 12:51pm
post #12 of 28
7/19/09 at 3:53pm
Great Salon article on Twitter:
I am a young twenty-something practically tethered to the Internet, as most young twenty-somethings are. And, don't get me wrong, the Internet is great. It's fantastic. Seriously, it's just plain wonderful. I can't imagine life without it and the idea that the Internet wasn't actually around at some point in my own lifetime is mind-boggling, to say nothing of the fact that the generations before me somehow grew up without it. (I heard they used some kind of "p-mail.")
But I hate Twitter. I reserve for Twitter one of the greatest, purest hatreds: not one borne out of anger or emotion, but one borne out of philosophy. I do not hate Twitter in the way that I hate stubbing my toe, or in the way that I hate Tracy Morgan. I hate Twitter in the same way that, say, Copernicus hated geocentrism. I'm not being irrational or hysterical - it is just that Twitter is so thoroughly wrong and so prolifically wrong that its very existence undermines our otherwise rational and mostly progressive society.
Let me first say that I do not hate those who use Twitter. I understand that, for most people, Twitter is just the next iteration of the MySpace/LiveJournal/BullShit social networking superfad that threatens to engulf the planet. I understand that most people use Twitter casually and without malice. I understand that most Twitter users do not believe that they can cause so much damage in 140 characters or less. These people I understand, and I can hate them no more than I can hate the average sixteenth century peasant for believing that the sun revolves around the earth. So don't feel insulted.
I am not the first person to hate on Twitter, and I am sure the reasons are obvious. Twitter is the epitome of the current wave of Web 2.0 content, which can be essentially summarized as the following:
"Everybody cares what I had for lunch today."
It doesn't matter where you are or what you're eating - if you're connected to the Internet or to a phone (a distinction that will greatly date this essay within six months), you're able to tell dozens if not hundreds of people what you just crammed down your throat. Someone could be stranded in the middle of the Amazon Jungle, surviving off maggots and tiger meat, and they would still find a way to tweet "Blegh! Tiger meat again!" And somehow this would make tiger fighting completely boring.
Of course, at this point many readers will wag their finger and object, "Ah, but my Twitter is better than that. I tweet about interesting things in my life, and [worse yet] I tweet hilarious jokes!" Others might object that many celebrities, writers, and other important figures have interesting Twitters that are worth following. Some others might object that, even if Twitter is nothing more than a boring account of people's day-to-day lives, it's still worth reading.
I could respond to all such comments with a simple and deserved "shut up," but in the interest of argument I will point out three facts.
One: your Twitter is not interesting or funny, and you are no better than people who tweet about their sandwiches.
Two: I have never read a good or funny Twitter from a celebrity, even if the celebrity is a person I otherwise enjoy.
Three: whatever utility Twitter might have as a small-scale personal diary or communication cloud is negated by Twitter's tendency to clog up with @ replies and other nonsense.
Again, I don't hate Twitter users. I understand where they come from. Blogs proved too involved and unwieldy for the average user. Writing a cogent journal entry is too time-intensive and obviously boring. Twitter, on the other hand, not only allows you to limit yourself to trivial bullshit, but mandates you limit yourself to trivial bullshit. Nobody is worried about standards or being interesting when they only have 140 characters to work with. And when even professional comedians are tweeting about dinner, you don't have to worry about other Twitters making yours look bad.
If I sound angry, I am not. My position on Twitter is one of utmost composure and cool reason. I simply believe it is the worst thing happening in the world right now. I believe that the once great dream of an Internet with honest-to-god content has been lost. If modern web design means that breaking news comes through Twitter in between "Mm, a BLT" and "@tweetfan22 I had macaroni too!" then I want no part in the Internet of tomorrow. Just leave me be and I will return to Web 1.0 and publish through GeoCities.
I hold out some hope, though. I hold out hope that our collective intellects will win out in the end and people will snap out of this tweet-induced siren song. I believe that there is the real potential for there to exist some day an Internet with communities of substantial content and the free flow of ideas expounded on rather than excreted. I believe that, some day, perhaps even the most vigorous tweeters will come to realize just how erosive they are.
Because nobody cares what you had for lunch.
Quote:
I am a young twenty-something practically tethered to the Internet, as most young twenty-somethings are. And, don't get me wrong, the Internet is great. It's fantastic. Seriously, it's just plain wonderful. I can't imagine life without it and the idea that the Internet wasn't actually around at some point in my own lifetime is mind-boggling, to say nothing of the fact that the generations before me somehow grew up without it. (I heard they used some kind of "p-mail.")
But I hate Twitter. I reserve for Twitter one of the greatest, purest hatreds: not one borne out of anger or emotion, but one borne out of philosophy. I do not hate Twitter in the way that I hate stubbing my toe, or in the way that I hate Tracy Morgan. I hate Twitter in the same way that, say, Copernicus hated geocentrism. I'm not being irrational or hysterical - it is just that Twitter is so thoroughly wrong and so prolifically wrong that its very existence undermines our otherwise rational and mostly progressive society.
Let me first say that I do not hate those who use Twitter. I understand that, for most people, Twitter is just the next iteration of the MySpace/LiveJournal/BullShit social networking superfad that threatens to engulf the planet. I understand that most people use Twitter casually and without malice. I understand that most Twitter users do not believe that they can cause so much damage in 140 characters or less. These people I understand, and I can hate them no more than I can hate the average sixteenth century peasant for believing that the sun revolves around the earth. So don't feel insulted.
I am not the first person to hate on Twitter, and I am sure the reasons are obvious. Twitter is the epitome of the current wave of Web 2.0 content, which can be essentially summarized as the following:
"Everybody cares what I had for lunch today."
It doesn't matter where you are or what you're eating - if you're connected to the Internet or to a phone (a distinction that will greatly date this essay within six months), you're able to tell dozens if not hundreds of people what you just crammed down your throat. Someone could be stranded in the middle of the Amazon Jungle, surviving off maggots and tiger meat, and they would still find a way to tweet "Blegh! Tiger meat again!" And somehow this would make tiger fighting completely boring.
Of course, at this point many readers will wag their finger and object, "Ah, but my Twitter is better than that. I tweet about interesting things in my life, and [worse yet] I tweet hilarious jokes!" Others might object that many celebrities, writers, and other important figures have interesting Twitters that are worth following. Some others might object that, even if Twitter is nothing more than a boring account of people's day-to-day lives, it's still worth reading.
I could respond to all such comments with a simple and deserved "shut up," but in the interest of argument I will point out three facts.
One: your Twitter is not interesting or funny, and you are no better than people who tweet about their sandwiches.
Two: I have never read a good or funny Twitter from a celebrity, even if the celebrity is a person I otherwise enjoy.
Three: whatever utility Twitter might have as a small-scale personal diary or communication cloud is negated by Twitter's tendency to clog up with @ replies and other nonsense.
Again, I don't hate Twitter users. I understand where they come from. Blogs proved too involved and unwieldy for the average user. Writing a cogent journal entry is too time-intensive and obviously boring. Twitter, on the other hand, not only allows you to limit yourself to trivial bullshit, but mandates you limit yourself to trivial bullshit. Nobody is worried about standards or being interesting when they only have 140 characters to work with. And when even professional comedians are tweeting about dinner, you don't have to worry about other Twitters making yours look bad.
If I sound angry, I am not. My position on Twitter is one of utmost composure and cool reason. I simply believe it is the worst thing happening in the world right now. I believe that the once great dream of an Internet with honest-to-god content has been lost. If modern web design means that breaking news comes through Twitter in between "Mm, a BLT" and "@tweetfan22 I had macaroni too!" then I want no part in the Internet of tomorrow. Just leave me be and I will return to Web 1.0 and publish through GeoCities.
I hold out some hope, though. I hold out hope that our collective intellects will win out in the end and people will snap out of this tweet-induced siren song. I believe that there is the real potential for there to exist some day an Internet with communities of substantial content and the free flow of ideas expounded on rather than excreted. I believe that, some day, perhaps even the most vigorous tweeters will come to realize just how erosive they are.
Because nobody cares what you had for lunch.
post #13 of 28
7/19/09 at 4:35pm
What I don't understand about twitter is that, if you have a lot of followers and are following a lot of people, you basically get tweets all day long on a continuous basis. Isn't that kind of impossible to do? I'm not going to connect my twitter account to my cell phone and have my phone vibrate every 10 seconds because someone posted a new tweet.
I use twitter for business and I post on it every time I write an article. All I write is the name of the article and the web address where it can be found. I don't bother to read anyone else's tweets, and I suspect that very few people are reading mine, even though I have a lot of followers. This basically makes the whole thing useless.
I use twitter for business and I post on it every time I write an article. All I write is the name of the article and the web address where it can be found. I don't bother to read anyone else's tweets, and I suspect that very few people are reading mine, even though I have a lot of followers. This basically makes the whole thing useless.
post #14 of 28
7/19/09 at 4:59pm
post #15 of 28
7/19/09 at 5:11pm
Return Home
Back to Forum: General Chat
- Twitter is finished!
Currently, there are 1076 Active Users
(288 Members and 788 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › The Ultimate Vass Porn Thread 1 minute ago
- › What song or tune is stuck in your head today? 2 minutes ago
- › I have a jean...(The Ultimate Jean Thread For Beginners) - ask... 2 minutes ago
- › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 3 minutes ago
- › Rock Your Socks- show your sock, shoe & pant combos 3 minutes ago
- › Recent Sartorialist Looks 5 minutes ago
- › Technical Outerwear 5 minutes ago
- › How much should I spend on my 1st blue blazer// Any quick recs? 5 minutes ago
- › Bonobos=best pants I've ever worn. $25 off coupon code 7 minutes ago
- › things that are making you happy 7 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › ALPRO P 220 by Linda1988
- › Taylor Stitch Cone Mills Flatout 10 oz denim shirt by 3dials
- › Energie Bracelet by Miro Labaj
- › Brooks Brothers Sterling Silver Money Clip by deveandepot1
- › Frank and Oak Gosford Belt by deveandepot1
- › APC Petit Standard by cv123
- › The Lamb-The Lamb by j
- › Everlane Bag by deveandepot1
- › Fred Perry Vintage Twill Backpack - Navy by Mbdu Ckfu
- › Converse All Star Chuck Taylor Leather OX - Black by Mbdu Ckfu
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › What Tuxedo Do I Need For A Black Tie Event? by shawea
- › What Should I Ask My Groomsmen to Wear? by shawea
- › How Do I Look Cool? by shawea
- › What Kind of Suit Should I Buy? by shawea
- › How Should I Start My Business Wardrobe? by shawea
- › What Should I Wear To A Job Interview? by shawea
- › A Tom Ford Quantum Suiting by David Zaritsky
- › the-difference-between-fused-and-canvassed-su... by LA Guy
- › tailoring-allowances-by-jeffery-diduch-jefferyd by LA Guy
- › the-basics-of-wedding-attire by Blackhood
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About Styleforum | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Styleforum is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About Styleforum | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Styleforum is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map








