or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Too young to bang?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Too young to bang? - Page 7

post #91 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarphe View Post
so it is against the law to have sex if you are too young in some states? for example idaho if 2 17 year old have sex they are breaking the law?
Interesting dovetail between this thread and the Sotomayor one, where Matt et al. are talking about social norms codified into law, etc. The answer is, it depends. In some states, and presumably in other countries around the world, the age of consent is the Age of Consent. Period. C+1 day bangs C-1 day, that's a crime. Full stop. Others have what are called "Romeo & Juliet" laws, where there isn't an age of consent as much as a sliding scale based on stage of life or whatever else a given legislature decided to base it on. (One can almost hear some committee chairman saying, hmm, my 16 year-old son has a 14 year-old girlfriend, and it would look really bad for me if he went on trial for rape.) The case of Genarlow Wilson is fairly well known as an unintended and horrible consequence of rigid age of consent laws. He was by all press accounts a good kid, an athlete-honor student. He was 17, and his girlfriend was 15. They were caught having oral sex on video during a holiday, and he was charged and convicted for it. Ten years, no parole. As a further tie-in to the Sotomayor thread, even the backwards and largely stupid Georgia General Assembly took offense to the law as they had written it, and as the courts had faithfully interpreted it. So they rewrote Georgia's consent law to make such conduct legal. And now 17 year-old kids can get blown by their 15 year-old girlfriends in Georgia with only the girl's parents to fear. Which, I believe, is as it should be.
post #92 of 103
In summation, if I'm 30 and she's 21 then it's cool, right? Does working in the same office throw a kink into this?

I don't know why I'm posting this, my mind is already made up
post #93 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by bach View Post
read this.
http://chuckpalahniuk.net/features/shorts/guts

see the moral of the story?

damn
post #94 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambo View Post
Who could have ever guessed how you would have responded. You're really turning over a new leaf.
... just saying.
post #95 of 103
IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.       I AGREE

TIP: to embed Youtube clips, put only the encoded part of the Youtube URL, e.g. eBGIQ7ZuuiU between the tags.
post #96 of 103
I'm 26 and have not been replying to the online dating messages I've been getting from 20 year olds. Too young. 21 is the absolute minimum for me.
post #97 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroStyles View Post
I'm 26 and have not been replying to the online dating messages I've been getting from 20 year olds. Too young. 21 is the absolute minimum for me.

Just reply and then wait a few months till they turn 21 to meet them in person. You're throwing away perfectly good opportunities that you will regret when you're old and bald and fat and can't get an erection anymore.
post #98 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroStyles View Post
I'm 26 and have not been replying to the online dating messages I've been getting from 20 year olds. Too young. 21 is the absolute minimum for me.
Are you gay?
post #99 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey_birdman View Post
ill regret when you're old and bald and fat and can't get an erection anymore.

aka, 29.
post #100 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey_birdman View Post
Just reply and then wait a few months till they turn 21 to meet them in person. You're throwing away perfectly good opportunities that you will regret when you're old and bald and fat and can't get an erection anymore.

I dunno, what's the point? 24-26 year olds are hot. Why would I do something that makes me feel dirty if I don't have to?
post #101 of 103
I'm with Styles on this one. Practically an entire lifetime of experience is lived between the ages of 20 and 21. Twenty-year-old chicks, while nubile and in their physical prime, seem like the emotional equivalent of 8-year-olds the second you hit your mid 20s.

I remember being 25 and going on a date with a 20 year old. It just felt wrong in so many ways. Like we were from two separate worlds. Contrast this with the fact that I am now 30 and have no qualms about dating 23 year olds. Technically, the age difference is greater. But the emotional gulf isn't as wide.

Pre-legal drinking age, even though most people have drunk like fish long before 21, is just too weird.
post #102 of 103
You guys are fucked up, and I say that as someone older than the both of you.
post #103 of 103
I didn't read the entire thread so I apologize if its asked already. Pics of her may help us in the decision making process.

But seriously, if she claims or her folks claim rape and you get convicted you may have to register as a sex offender. You DO NOT want that status. BTW, and you're probably not going to to a country club prison but a bend you over and pound you in the ass one (got that from "Office Space").

Wait till she's 18 or the legal age.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Too young to bang?