Originally Posted by foodguy
i liked "rose" a lot more than "foucalt" ... but that's just me. I have a friend (american) who took eco's semiotics class in bologna ... in italian. amazing.
Agreed that Rose is better, but FP is still a good time. The super-cerebral antidote to Dan Brown's oeuvre.
Oh, and re: Eco, a few lovely lines from Black Swan:
“The writer Umberto Eco belongs to that small class of scholars who are encylopedic, insightful, and nondull. He is the owner of a large personal library (containing thirty thousand books), and separates visitors into two categories: those who react with “Wow! Signore professore dottore Eco, what a library you have! How many of these books have you read?” and the others - a very small minority - who get the point that a private library is not an ego-boosting appendage but a research tool. Read books are far less valuable than unread ones. The library should contain as much of what you do not know as your financial means, mortgage rates, and the currently tight read-estate market allows you to put there. You will accumulate more knowledge and more books as you grow older, and the growing number of unread books on the shelves will look at you menacingly. Indeed, the more you know, the larger the rows of unread books. Let us call this collection of unread books an antilibrary."