Quote:
Originally Posted by
turbozed 
It just comes across as pretentious and overbearing. It's like the literary equivalent of wearing too much cologne.
Doesn't it at least interest you to get a glimpse at what's behind the juice in the bottles? Admittedly he sometimes falls in love with his knowledge, but I'd rather read someone who cares than, say, Chandler Burr who seems to read the perfumer's brief and then tell us the names of the synthetic compounds that went into the bottle.
How boring would it be to read: smells like XXXX, YYYYY, and CCCC. When it dries down it smells like ..... And besides: the smells vary depending on skin chemistry anyway (not a lot, but still), AND they smell different on paper than on skin: see the reviews for Mona di Orio - a few people I trust have her perfumes and tell me that they are indeed vile on paper (Turin savages each one with a special bile)...but magnificent on skin. Reviewing from that perspective is tricky business, might as well talk a little bit about some other aspect of it.