Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › Records / Vinyl versus CDs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Records / Vinyl versus CDs - Page 3

post #31 of 37
5/22/09 at 12:08pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tagutcow View Post
I'm not sure I fully understand what you're saying here. I know subtracting one channel from another is a common "voice cancellation" process, but from the way you describe it, I don't see how would you get different material out of the left speaker than the right.

You don't necessarily get different material, but what differences there are between channels are amplified.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Artisan Fan View Post
Well perhaps we can be diplomatic and say that I hear much more detail and musicality on my vinyl rig than my expensive CD/SACD player.

Fair enough.

--Andre
Reply
Reply
post #32 of 37
5/22/09 at 4:39pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tck13 View Post
So, uh, records can sound just as good as CDs?

Hmmmm.

Yepper. And even better than CDs to my ears.
Reply
Reply
post #33 of 37
5/22/09 at 5:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Y View Post
LPs can sound great, and often better than their CD counterparts. But I wish audiophiles wouldn't try to make up bogus technical reasons why, and instead just enjoy their LPs.

But what would be left of audiophilia if you took away the bogus technical reasoning???

But seriously, it puzzles me too. Vinyl appeals to me because of its obvious imperfections. Their degradation over time, lack of any true silence, ability to be physically manipulated -- everything about records calls attention to the fact that you're listening to a recording. Audiophiles don't really seem to value these things too highly -- it's all about finding the "perfect" sound that transparently replicates live performance.
Reply
Reply
post #34 of 37
5/22/09 at 11:52pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiru View Post
But seriously, it puzzles me too. Vinyl appeals to me because of its obvious imperfections. Their degradation over time, lack of any true silence, ability to be physically manipulated -- everything about records calls attention to the fact that you're listening to a recording. Audiophiles don't really seem to value these things too highly -- it's all about finding the "perfect" sound that transparently replicates live performance.

Seems like you have never heard a good table. Modern vinyl can be as silent as CD. Especially a Pallas or Classic pressing. Dead silent.
Reply
Reply
post #35 of 37
5/25/09 at 5:38pm
You're right, I don't own any newly pressed vinyl. All of mine is pre-invention of the CD. However this was sort of my point -- that audiophiles seem to love vinyl but hate everything that makes it attractive. I enjoy the sonic patina. Silent vinyl seems... wrong :shrug:
Reply
Reply
post #36 of 37
5/25/09 at 6:27pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiru View Post
You're right, I don't own any newly pressed vinyl. All of mine is pre-invention of the CD. However this was sort of my point -- that audiophiles seem to love vinyl but hate everything that makes it attractive. I enjoy the sonic patina. Silent vinyl seems... wrong :shrug:
Actually I think audiophiles just tune out the snap, crackle and pop on older records. You listen past it to the get that musical analog warmth that sounds like the master tape. But we do appreciate a nice clean sounding dynamic LP like some of the new jazz reissues. The MusicMatters Blue Notes are as good as almost all the first pressings I have heard and they are much quieter and more affordable.
Reply
Reply
post #37 of 37
5/25/09 at 7:23pm
^^ btw, I didn't intend to imply an 'original pressing' snobbery. I'm not so serious about records so what I pick up is cheap and used. If I was going out of my way to hear a certain album on vinyl certainly I would buy a new pressing rather than something collectible/expensive
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › Records / Vinyl versus CDs