Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Health & Body › ideal amount of running miles
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

ideal amount of running miles - Page 2

post #16 of 30
NUMBER of miles, not amount of miles.

NUMBER of calories, not amount of calories.
post #17 of 30
The really annoying thing is LESS calories -- it's FEWER calories.

I see it all the time on TV commercials, foods, etc. and I'm sure I lose a few hairs on my head every time.
post #18 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by why View Post
I see it all the time on TV commercials, foods, etc. and I'm sure I lose a few hairs on my head every time.

Soon we won't be able to tell you apart from kunk.
post #19 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbie View Post
Soon we won't be able to tell you apart from kunk.
I'll still be much more beautiful.
post #20 of 30
Running is a stupid idea. Great way to destroy your legs. Biking is the answer.
post #21 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connemara View Post
Running is a stupid idea. Great way to destroy your legs. Biking is the answer.

Tell that to the millions of runners who have put in miles since before you were born, conneboy.
post #22 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by whacked View Post
Tell that to the millions of runners who have put in miles since before you were born, conneboy.

He's not incorrect.

Lots of arthritis and joint paint in the future of most runners.
post #23 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbie View Post
He's not incorrect.

Lots of arthritis and joint paint in the future of most runners.

Does that make running a stupid idea?
post #24 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwilkinson View Post
Does that make running a stupid idea?
I was talking about the "destroy your legs". As to it being a stupid idea, I will refrain from commenting. I'd like to add that there is at least one study I am aware of (too lazy to look it up) that has shown that there is no association between arthritis and running.
post #25 of 30
Not the most scientific of sources, but here you go
Quote:
The long term impact of running is a commonly debated issue. Running is widely recognised as being beneficial in minimising the effect of the aging process, reducing stress and strengthening the body. This article will seek to discuss these issues and evaluate the overall benefits running can have in the long term.

Several studies have researched the effect which running can have to minimising the effect of the aging process. Michael Pollock (1971) conducted a study of 27 elite runners at Wake University in North Carolina.

Over the following 30 years, 21 of these runners were still active and it was found that their body fat percentage had only increased marginally, their muscle mass had improved, their oxygen uptake remained considerably higher than average and they had experienced only a 5% drop in heart rate per decade, compared to a drop of 10% in non runners. The study concluded that long term running had managed to halt or even reverse the aging process in some aspects of the runner's bodies, showing significant long term benefits of sustained exercise.

Although a commonly cited disadvantage of running is the damage which it could potentially do to joints, this issue is often raised by non runners and not the health professionals who advise on it. In realty, if a runner is careful with injuries and wears adequate running shoes, the benefits to joints can be considerable. The reduction in body fat which runners enjoy reduces the subsequent strain which is placed on knees. A loss of 10 pounds is equal to a 45 pound reduction in the strain on knees.

Running has also been proved to strengthen the muscles and ligaments which support knees leading to them being stronger and more stable. The overall impact of running long term will therefore be reflected in the stronger joint and skeletal foundation. The mental side effects of the running have also been noted. The long term impact of experiencing a deeper and more restful sleep have been noted for mental health. The significant stress relieving impact of running has also been commonly suggested as a tool for relaxing. When these two factors are combined, the mental benefits of running in the long term become apparent. Overall, running can be seen to have considerable mental and physical benefits to the runner in the long term.

http://ezinearticles.com/?Long-Term-...ing&id=1536554
post #26 of 30
Running damages the knees. Anyone who says otherwise is deluding themselves.

Eating damages the teeth. Anyone who says otherwise is deluding themselves.
post #27 of 30
http://ezinearticles.com/?expert_bio=Martin_Forshaw I put next to zero faith in this author. And yes, I am aware of your statement before quoting the article.
post #28 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by why View Post
Eating damages the teeth. Anyone who says otherwise is deluding themselves.

If I stop eating, would this be a good way to lose some weight while protecting my teeth?
post #29 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbie View Post
If I stop eating, would this be a good way to lose some weight while protecting my teeth?

If you stop moving, would this be a good way to...

post #30 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase12 View Post
if i have a calorie deficit of about 500-700 per day, how many miles a week should i be aiming to run to optimize weight loss?

Most sources say you shouldn't try to lose more than 2lbs/week, and a calorie deficit of 3500 is 1lb, so you need to run enough to burn 3500 calories more. Using the formula cited, a 200lb man would need to run ~23 miles to burn that many calories.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Health & Body
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Health & Body › ideal amount of running miles