Quote:
Originally Posted by
jsqfunk 
However, people like truck drivers, airline pilots, police, etc. have to deal with random testing at least once a year for their entire career.
I'm not sure how it works law enforcement and military, but for civil drivers, pilots, boat captains, etc. they can of course be tested randomly by the police, but that's because they are operating potentially dangerous machinery and it has nothing to do with their employer. Of course, getting caught flying and airplane or controlling a boat while intoxicated is likely to cost you your job, and possibly jail time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fat-Elvis 
It's a pretty stupid practice as it doesn't really benefit anyone...I mean if you do enough drugs to affect your work, it will be reflected in your work, and they can fire you based on that alone. If you only smoke up a little every other weekend or on special occasions, then it won't be reflected in your work, and what the hell business is it of your employer's?
I agree, but even if it does affect your work I don't think immediately getting rid of the employee is always the best solution. I would not tolerate my employees showing up for work noticeably intoxicated. I would tell them to go home and come back when they were sober. Of course, if the problem persisted, letting them go might be the only practical solution, but I think it's important that employers also try to help their employees in situations where drug or alcohol abuse is causing problems in their everyday lives.
I'm not saying I would necessarily hire someone who was a known alcoholic or drug user, but I also wouldn't immediately fire someone if I found out they were.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fat-Elvis 
They test for all sorts of drugs but ironically it's by far the most benign of them all that stays in your system long enough to be caught even if only casually used, so in reality they're pretty much just testing for pot.
So, if you only stick to the stronger stuff, you'll be fine...?
