To each his own.
Recent Images In This Thread
Related Forum Threads
- NEW MEMBER INQUIRIES & QUICK QUESTIONS- CLASSIC MENSWEAR: WK OF JUL 20, 2015 Last post on 7/28/15 at 1:12pm in Classic Menswear
- NEW MEMBER INQUIRIES & QUICK QUESTIONS- CLASSIC MENSWEAR: WK OF JUL 6, 2015 Last post on 7/12/15 at 5:06pm in Classic Menswear
- NEW MEMBER INQUIRIES & QUICK QUESTIONS- CLASSIC MENSWEAR: WK OF APR 20, 2015 Last post on 4/26/15 at 5:41pm in Classic Menswear
- The Best of B&S - Someone should buy this! Last post on Today at 4:38 am in Classic Menswear
- MARGARET HOWELL Fall/Winter 2013 Last post on 8/5/15 at 11:44am in Streetwear and Denim
CT Shirts Presents: How to Choose the Best White Shirt for Your...
Last edited: 3/30/15
- What Should I Ask My Groomsmen to Wear?Last edited: 9/2/13
- How Should I Start My Business Wardrobe?Last edited: 5/16/13
- Andrew Lock
- The Armoury
- Buttons 'n' Threads
- David Fin
- David Reeves Bespoke
- Drinkwater's Cambridge
- Equus Leather
- Exquisite Trimmings
- A Fine Pair of Shoes
- Geil Mode
- Gentlemen's Footwear
- Gordon Yao, Hong Kong
- The Hanger Project
- Henry Carter Neckwear
- Howard Yount
- John Elliott + Co
- Kent Wang
- Khaki's of Carmel
- Luxire Custom Clothing
- M Classic 101
- Meermin Mallorca
- Need Supply Co.
- No Man Walks Alone
- Oak Room
- Paul Evans
- Percy Ivor
- Portland Dry Goods
- Proper Cloth
- S.E.H Kelly
- Self Edge
- Spier & Mackay
- Suspension Point
- Taylor Stitch
- Temple of jawnz
- Thurston Bros.
- Uncle Otis
- Virtual Clotheshorse
- Wolf vs. Goat
- Wrong Weather
- Yellow Hook Necktie
- Zampa Di Gallina
Gitman Brothers Vintage - Page 198post #2956 of 42968/2/12 at 9:16am
Styleforum Top Pickspost #2957 of 42968/2/12 at 9:17amQuote:Originally Posted by Dbear
WvG, if you desire a very slim and cropped cut, like interesting fabrics and MOP buttons. That is, if you want to shell out the initial cash to become a member, where you are basically locked in to buy a few shirts with a discount. The discount really just brings the shirt to the normal price. I can't imagine anyone buying it at full retail and that's sort of the point. The construction of the actual shirt isn't as good as GBV.
As for GBV, GB has been around forever, but the vintage line is fairly new. They basically took the shirt and refined the cut to be more modern (slim), but they still retained the box pleat for movement, but it causes the back to be billow, which is undesirable. So they went only 1/2 way on the slimness. Also, they retained the white or chalk buttons because, as they put it, "they're cheap!" and clearly they have a lot of them. The fabrics are really top notch. It's really the shining star of the line. They have the ability to source interesting and nice fabrics. It's the vintage part of it. They will go into their archives and pick a year and look at all the fabrics and use that as a springboard for each season. Although other companies are catching up and are able to source similar fabrics nowadays.
I've owned several WvG shirts and 10+ GBV shirts. Sold a lot of them over time, kept a few of my favorites. Just my opinion on these brands, no dog in the race, as I am very doubtful I will buy any shirts from either brand ever again.
Why is that?post #2958 of 42968/2/12 at 9:20amQuote:
I'm curious. Why do a lot of people hate the box pleat? Does it cause it to be too poofy at the back or something?
Also is this only a problem for the GBV when they're tucked? Or do they still have the poofy/billowing effect when worn untucked?post #2959 of 42968/2/12 at 9:28am
The point of the box pleat, as described by GB was to allow greater range of movement. This was a design of Gitman Bros like several decades ago. Their target audience was factory and blue collar workers, not fashion or modern or anything like that.
Yes, it makes it more poofy, less poofy if you tuck it in, but more still poofy than a shirt that doesn't have the pleat. The vintage line slimmed everything down, but the pleat was retained, as it's one of their "signatures".post #2960 of 42968/7/12 at 7:54amQuote:Originally Posted by althanis
I don't get the hate for the basics - I think it makes a lot of sense to spend $100 to get good quality staples that you can wear lots of times hopefully over a couple years, if not more.
On the other hand, how many times can you really wear a hideous llama or pinup shirt without people thinking you only have 1 or 2 shirts? So then why spend $150 on it? If you want a crazy, really out there print that you can wear a couple times before it becomes last season's shirt, then it makes more sense to me to get something that costs less.
Why would I care if people think I only have one or two shirts because I might wear a llama shirt once a week or so? Newsflash!: No one gives a shit about the stuff you wear and the intervals in which you wear them. Everyone wears the same clothes over and over, so they don't really give a shit. The "last season" comment is dumb, and I'm sure you can figure out why I'm saying that.
Here is the pitfall of Gitman basics: they're not that great. They're not made of carbon fiber. They don't breathe better than other oxfords. There is not a major difference in construction to put it above others for the price ($147 retail, $100 on sale white oxford). The fit isn't anything amazing. What does it have going for it? It has the name Gitman Vintage, which has been hyped all over heritage/j. crew prep/hip lumberjack blogs and shit for the past few years.
My argument is that you're deluding yourself into thinking that Gitman is oh so much better than all other shirt makers when really they aren't. Seriously, you can buy 5 basic oxfords or stripes or whatever at Uniqlo for the price of 1 Gitman if you're wearing this shit for work. Uniqlo isn't going to magically disintegrate in your hands or in the washer or even over the course of a year. If you haven't tried Uniqlo basics, I would suggest you head over to the thread and check them out. The Uniqlo oxfords aren't just "passable"; it's probably the best thing on the market right now for basics.
For the record, I own a bunch of Gitman prints, and have owned a lot of Gitman basics in the past as well as WvG, Band of Outsiders, Thom Browne, Epaulet, etc. Sold them all cause it wasn't worth the money, now it's Uniqlo for oxfords.post #2961 of 42968/7/12 at 11:58amQuote:Originally Posted by marmottan
How would you compare a GV (OCBD) sz. Small to a Brooks Brothers Black Fleece or standard BB?
I usually take BB1 (for Black Fleece) and Small or 15/33-34 for others shirts.
I'm afraid Small could fit too small or short (especially the sleeves).
Thanks for your help.Quote:Originally Posted by tonio028
I am a BB1 in Black Fleece, small in Gitman Vintage, and 15-33 in the Extra Slim Fit BB shirts for comparison. The sleeves on Gitman are generally a tad on the short side, but since I generally roll up my sleeves I don't find it to be an issue. If you plan to pair it with suit or blazer, it could be more noticeable.
For your information, the Small i ordered was too tight and the sleeves were ridiculously too short. I had to return it (thanks to Mr. Porter btw for their return policy).
I exchanged the Small one for a Medium. The Medium is perfect (sleeves, proportions, etc).
It fits me much better than BB1 (BB Black Fleece), Brooks Brothers "Small" or RL Purple label "Small".
I usually take 14.5/15 and 33/34.
Hope this helps.post #2962 of 42968/8/12 at 2:34pmpost #2963 of 42968/8/12 at 2:37pmpost #2964 of 42968/8/12 at 2:39pmQuote:
Collar 13.5", sleeve length 32", shoulder to shoulder 16.5", chest 17.5"
(via official GV website)post #2965 of 42968/8/12 at 5:24pmpost #2966 of 42968/8/12 at 5:35pmAs a guy who has tried lots of different shirts, I would say that I never have to tailor my Gitman Vintage shirts. I cannot say the same for J. Crew (way too baggy in waist and arm circumference), Woolrich John Rich & Bros, or any other brand. Correction, 18 Waits' cotton gauze shirts (so comfortable) fit well. The point is, more "mainstream" designer clothing lines have always needed a trip to the tailor to get them done right, whereas I can wear my Gitman Vintage shirts right off the shelf.
YMMV, but that's my experience.post #2967 of 42968/8/12 at 6:52pmI know this isn't the sales thread, but I just thought I'd put these out here for regulars before I put it on B&S. I have 2 plaid Size Small shirts from the My Habit sale, that are way too small for me. I am usually a size Small, but didn't know you had to size up for the plaid that looks like Blackwatch, so these are essentially size XS.
The photo is here:
I live in Canada, so had to pay shipping and duties, so the price is higher than the $60 I paid for it. If anyone's interested, let me know, thanks.post #2968 of 42968/8/12 at 7:46pmYeah my XS Plaid shirt just came in from my habit and its tiny even for me, also lol that is the same shirt I got. Im probably going to ebay it
Just looking at the measurements on context clothing. the XS looks quite similar to the XS plaid I received. if I get a white oxford should i just get a size S?
althanis do you generally wear S in other shirts or just in other gitman shirts?
Edited by computurd - 8/8/12 at 8:02pmpost #2969 of 42968/8/12 at 7:49pmQuote:
I'm 5'7'' and 120lbs and XS fits me perfectly. If you are going to buy GBV, you have to go for XS, S would be too huge for you.
Both of my GBV ends where the red line is, and for you I think XS shirts will stop at the green line.post #2970 of 42968/8/12 at 8:03pm
So after reading through this thread I'd think that a small would fit me well - I'm about 5'10, 145 pounds with shirts that measure around 28" in length.
But I'm seeing some ebay listings that put the back length at 30"1/2 for a small flannel and the chest at 18". Did they just get lazy with the measuring or does the sizing vary by that much?
- Gitman Brothers Vintage
Styleforum Top Picks
- What Should I Ask My Groomsmen to Wear?
- › ***The official Alden thread *** 1 minute ago
- › Edward Green Appreciation: Pictures, Info, and Where to Buy 1 minute ago
- › Khaki's of Carmel - Official Affiliate Thread - Carmel-by-the-Sea,... 3 minutes ago
- › The What Are You Wearing Today (WAYWT) Discussion Thread, Part II 4 minutes ago
- › The Shell Cordovan, non-Alden Shoe and Boot Thread 6 minutes ago
- › The Ultimate Vass (Footwear) Porn Thread 9 minutes ago
- › The official thrift/discount store bragging thread - Part II... 10 minutes ago
- › POLL: Is Eidos Napoli an Italian or an American brand ? 10 minutes ago
- › Why wear a wrist watch when you could easily consult your phone for... 10 minutes ago
- › Saint Laurent Paris - Official Thread. 11 minutes ago
- › Human Scales Braided Dark Brown Belt by Mrvaerk
- › Human Scales Carlos Red Stripe Sweater by Mrvaerk
- › Carmina for Epaulet Grey Suede Steinbeck Boot by Patek
- › Human Scales Denny Suede Double Monkstraps by Mrvaerk
- › Brathwait - The classic slim wrist watch by Mrvaerk
- › Ps Paul Smith Laced shoes by yucaseca
- › Tom Ford FT5237 Eyeglasses Color 098 by Mrvaerk
- › Irish Setter Men's 838 Wingshooter 6" Waterproof Lace-up... by seanhorween
- › Borsa Long sleeve shirt by techstyles
- › Neil Barrett - LEATHER TROUSERS by newway
- › Announcing the winner of the Kent Wang...
- › Styleforum Visits Viberg Boot Company
- › Mohair: A Little-Known Hot-Weather Cloth
- › The Myth of the Nice Guy: Baseball’s...
- › Three Gin Cocktails for Summertime
- › Styleforum Visits Blue Blue Japan
- › Styleforum Eats its Way Through Tokyo
- › David Looks Back at Pitti Uomo 88
- › Streetstyle: The Best Pictures From Pitti...
- › The Styleforum Brief: July, 2015