or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Gitman Brothers Vintage
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gitman Brothers Vintage - Page 195

post #2911 of 4112
Purple llamas, surprisingly appealing.

Pin-up, unsurprisingly hideous.
post #2912 of 4112
Quote:
Originally Posted by APK View Post

I shouldn't like that heinous Llama print as much as I do, but damn it, I've caught myself thinking about it several times since I saw it on your site this morning.
BTW, there's a small error in the write-up for that shirt:

nah dude, the colorway is great, llamas are one of those things you just wouldn't expect to work out (on a shirt) but the purple complements the yellow llama satisfied.gif
post #2913 of 4112

From anyone that has owned Gitman oxfords or shirts in general... Is Context Clothing accurate in their portrayal of the way it fits? From these pictures, they fit really well and slim. If anyone has inputs, I'd really greatly appreciate it as I'm looking for nice shirts/oxfords that will last me a while and fit slim and slender. Thanks again.

 

 700

 

700

post #2914 of 4112

I just picked up the Wimbledon chambray from Need Supply and I would say that Context's photos seem accurate in fit.

 

Very slim fitting through the waist, as the photo shows. 

post #2915 of 4112

Take notice at how the box pleat in the center causes the lower back to billow.

 

Also, the small in gitman is pretty slim and small.  medium is less slim.  large is a tent.  etc.  

post #2916 of 4112
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAL 9000 View Post

From anyone that has owned Gitman oxfords or shirts in general... Is Context Clothing accurate in their portrayal of the way it fits? From these pictures, they fit really well and slim. If anyone has inputs, I'd really greatly appreciate it as I'm looking for nice shirts/oxfords that will last me a while and fit slim and slender. Thanks again.

 http://www.styleforum.net/content/type/61/id/450338/width/350/height/700

http://www.styleforum.net/content/type/61/id/450339/width/350/height/700

If you search the thread for (sizing) or fit you should get a bunch of input, but I like the fit. Mine fit me similar to the Context pictures you posted. I'm 5'8", 150 and wear a small. The only nit-pic I have is the back poof with the half pleat used on the shirts, but you can always have those darted by a tailor if it bothers you. Since I generally wear mine tucked in for work, it's not as bad.
post #2917 of 4112

Some great replies. Thanks guys! I'm planning to wear my oxfords and shirts untucked, not tucked. Will Gitmans look slim/shapely enough? Mind you, that I'm an XS, so I'm hoping they know their sizing for us smaller guys. And is the length shown on Context accurate?

post #2918 of 4112

It was my first Gitman Vintage shirt, but from what I've heard, depending on season and material, fits can be all over the place. I've also gathered that as you go up in letter sizes, the chest increases around 2 inches, which accounts for that tent-like fit of the large.

 

I'm 5'10, 160lb-ish and I also wear a small. I have a pretty small chest (somewhere between 36-37) so it fit me pretty well.

 

The particular Wimbledon chambray is pretty thin, so I'll most likely be wearing it untucked casually rather than tucked in, but I don't really have a problem with any kind of back poof.

 

I'll try to post fit pics later if I get a chance.

post #2919 of 4112
Quote:
Originally Posted by forsan View Post

It was my first Gitman Vintage shirt, but from what I've heard, depending on season and material, fits can be all over the place. I've also gathered that as you go up in letter sizes, the chest increases around 2 inches, which accounts for that tent-like fit of the large.

 

I'm 5'10, 160lb-ish and I also wear a small. I have a pretty small chest (somewhere between 36-37) so it fit me pretty well.

 

The particular Wimbledon chambray is pretty thin, so I'll most likely be wearing it untucked casually rather than tucked in, but I don't really have a problem with any kind of back poof.

 

I'll try to post fit pics later if I get a chance.

 

Awesome! Thanks man. Greatly appreciate it.

post #2920 of 4112
When I first started wearing GBV, I thought it was too blousy, but now the fit has grown on me smile.gif
post #2921 of 4112
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAL 9000 View Post

Some great replies. Thanks guys! I'm planning to wear my oxfords and shirts untucked, not tucked. Will Gitmans look slim/shapely enough? Mind you, that I'm an XS, so I'm hoping they know their sizing for us smaller guys. And is the length shown on Context accurate?

I am 5'7'' and 120 lbs and wear XS. I am pretty skinny around the chest and waist, but GBV in XS fits me really well. I usually wear XS in all brands if it's available, but S in brands that doesnt provide XS. 

post #2922 of 4112
Oh fuck that llama shirt is sick
post #2923 of 4112
The shirt that was posted, the front looks great but the back looks like crap. Am I the only one seeing this?
post #2924 of 4112
That's pretty much how GBV fits. The box pleat is stupid.
post #2925 of 4112
Sure this has been covered but what is the best way to fix this at the tailor?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Gitman Brothers Vintage