or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Gitman Brothers Vintage
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gitman Brothers Vintage - Page 185

post #2761 of 4038
Sleeves look short, but the rest looks fine. You could wear it with the sleeves rolled up.

Here's how to do spoilers:
Code:
[SPOILER=Whatever text you want here]stuff you want hidden here[/SPOILER]

Edited by kgmessier - 6/25/12 at 12:56pm
post #2762 of 4038
Anyone have a RED oxford in M...or other oxford cloth or madras Gitmans in M. Shoot me a PM.
post #2763 of 4038

Anyone knows how the blue striped oxford shirt's fit is?

post #2764 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingusberry View Post

Anyone knows how the blue striped oxford shirt's fit is?

My blue/white stripe from Unionmade fits just like all the other oxfords I own (gray, blue, etc.)
post #2765 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by warrenjl1 View Post


My blue/white stripe from Unionmade fits just like all the other oxfords I own (gray, blue, etc.)

But does it have a slim fit or classic/regular fit? 

post #2766 of 4038
Gitman Vintage is the modern, slimmer fit. Gitman Brothers is the regular fit. All of the shirts talked about in this thread are for Gitman Vintage. Gitman oxfords are not "itchy", it's just the texture of the flannel shirt you bought.
post #2767 of 4038
Fuck. One shirt from the myhabit sale is actually Gitman Brothers. Fits like a parachute.

Anw im checking interest before returning. if anyone want this in size Large, fits like normal L in gitman vintage, but the colour doesnt work for me.

469
post #2768 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingusberry View Post

350x467px-LL-cd768d38_lulz.png
What do you guys thing about the fit? The sleeves is too short, but I am not sure about the whole fit.
The shirt end is above my ass cheeks at the backside and in the center of the "dick-thing" on the jeans.
The fabric itches like hell, and I hope not that Gitman oxford shirts doesn't fit or have the same itchy fabrics like this shirts.
Is there a difference between the oxford shirts and the plaid ones?
[SPOILER=350x263px-LL-db23dd85_DSC00267.jpeg
350x263px-LL-dbc67256_DSC00265.jpeg
350x263px-LL-50cb69d2_DSC00263.jpeg][/SPOILER]?

Same dilemma here man smh. If anyone wants to buy this shit off of me or willing to trade any other shirt in a Size Small PM me before I return it!
post #2769 of 4038
^ looks like the women's shirt ? Super short hem and sleeves?
post #2770 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbear View Post

^ looks like the women's shirt ? Super short hem and sleeves?

How do I go about telling it's a women shirt? Wouldn't it have the "Sisters" tag somewhere?
post #2771 of 4038
if it fits you like it fits dingusberry, return it...
post #2772 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbear View Post

^ looks like the women's shirt ? Super short hem and sleeves?

It wasn't huge around the chest area, which is usual for women's shirt. 

post #2773 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleepthat View Post

How do I go about telling it's a women shirt? Wouldn't it have the "Sisters" tag somewhere?

There is no sisters tag anywhere on them. But there are a few things that IMO are indicative of it:

-sleeves that are way short (think shorter than they would be even if it was a mans shirt mis marked a size).
-shoulders are way narrow. (think narrower than they would be even if it was a mans shirt mis marked a size).
-a little extra room in the chest (bust)
-maybe a very slight flare at the bottom (hips)

They didn't make a ton of gitman sisters shirts in terms of the fabrics used, but the ones I know of for sure is the one I posted a pic of myself wearing a few pages back and also an oxford in a kind of 'washed red'. I think opinions may differ here, but i am pretty damn certain on this.

google image search 'gitman sisters' as well.
post #2774 of 4038
Quote:
Originally Posted by slack tide View Post

There is no sisters tag anywhere on them. But there are a few things that IMO are indicative of it:
-sleeves that are way short (think shorter than they would be even if it was a mans shirt mis marked a size).
-shoulders are way narrow. (think narrower than they would be even if it was a mans shirt mis marked a size).
-a little extra room in the chest (bust)
-maybe a very slight flare at the bottom (hips)
They didn't make a ton of gitman sisters shirts in terms of the fabrics used, but the ones I know of for sure is the one I posted a pic of myself wearing a few pages back and also an oxford in a kind of 'washed red'. I think opinions may differ here, but i am pretty damn certain on this.
google image search 'gitman sisters' as well.

Ahh I see. I believe this is the case for the shirt I received.
post #2775 of 4038
Well....now I am second guessing myself after reading this:
Quote:
The collection uses the same fabrics and details as the classic men’s shirts, but it’s been expertly tweaked to fit females. Namely, the collar has been minimized, the pockets are smaller, and there’s a flattering central seam in the back.

so it looks like the true easy to ID indicators should be a smaller than normal pocket and a seam in the back. Anyone have these on their shirts?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Gitman Brothers Vintage